From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug report] net/mlx5e: Generalize IPsec work structs
Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 16:24:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230423132412.GB4782@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef32c2b-8e07-486b-af8d-9d332d5426ab@kili.mountain>
On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 11:24:09AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hello Leon Romanovsky,
>
> This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings.
>
> The patch 4562116f8a56: "net/mlx5e: Generalize IPsec work structs"
> from Mar 30, 2023, leads to the following Smatch complaint:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c:755 mlx5e_xfrm_free_state()
> error: we previously assumed 'sa_entry->work' could be null (see line 746)
Thanks for the report,
I fixed it in commit 94edec448479 ("net/mlx5e: Properly release work data structure")
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> 745
> 746 if (sa_entry->work)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> 747 cancel_work_sync(&sa_entry->work->work);
> 748
> 749 if (sa_entry->dwork)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> These checks can be deleted, right?
>
> 750 cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sa_entry->dwork->dwork);
> 751
> 752 mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(sa_entry);
> 753 mlx5_ipsec_free_sa_ctx(sa_entry);
> 754 kfree(sa_entry->dwork);
> 755 kfree(sa_entry->work->data);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Unchecked dereference.
>
> 756 kfree(sa_entry->work);
> 757 sa_entry_free:
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-23 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-20 8:24 [bug report] net/mlx5e: Generalize IPsec work structs Dan Carpenter
2023-04-23 13:24 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230423132412.GB4782@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox