linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
To: jgg@nvidia.com, zyjzyj2000@gmail.com, edwards@nvidia.com,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH for-next 3/6] RDMA/rxe: Fix access checks in rxe_check_bind_mw
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 17:13:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230530221334.89432-4-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230530221334.89432-1-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>

The subroutine rxe_check_bind_mw() in rxe_mw.c performs checks
on the mw access flags before they are set so they always succeed.
This patch instead checks the access flags passed in the send wqe.

Fixes: 32a577b4c3a9 ("RDMA/rxe: Add support for bind MW work requests")
Signed-off-by: Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
index afa5ce1a7116..a7ec57ab8fad 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mw.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ int rxe_dealloc_mw(struct ib_mw *ibmw)
 }
 
 static int rxe_check_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
-			 struct rxe_mw *mw, struct rxe_mr *mr)
+			 struct rxe_mw *mw, struct rxe_mr *mr, int access)
 {
 	if (mw->ibmw.type == IB_MW_TYPE_1) {
 		if (unlikely(mw->state != RXE_MW_STATE_VALID)) {
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int rxe_check_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
 		}
 
 		/* o10-36.2.2 */
-		if (unlikely((mw->access & IB_ZERO_BASED))) {
+		if (unlikely((access & IB_ZERO_BASED))) {
 			rxe_dbg_mw(mw, "attempt to bind a zero based type 1 MW\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int rxe_check_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
 	}
 
 	/* C10-74 */
-	if (unlikely((mw->access &
+	if (unlikely((access &
 		      (IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_WRITE | IB_ACCESS_REMOTE_ATOMIC)) &&
 		     !(mr->access & IB_ACCESS_LOCAL_WRITE))) {
 		rxe_dbg_mw(mw,
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int rxe_check_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
 	}
 
 	/* C10-75 */
-	if (mw->access & IB_ZERO_BASED) {
+	if (access & IB_ZERO_BASED) {
 		if (unlikely(wqe->wr.wr.mw.length > mr->ibmr.length)) {
 			rxe_dbg_mw(mw,
 				"attempt to bind a ZB MW outside of the MR\n");
@@ -133,12 +133,12 @@ static int rxe_check_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
 }
 
 static void rxe_do_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe,
-		      struct rxe_mw *mw, struct rxe_mr *mr)
+		      struct rxe_mw *mw, struct rxe_mr *mr, int access)
 {
 	u32 key = wqe->wr.wr.mw.rkey & 0xff;
 
 	mw->rkey = (mw->rkey & ~0xff) | key;
-	mw->access = wqe->wr.wr.mw.access;
+	mw->access = access;
 	mw->state = RXE_MW_STATE_VALID;
 	mw->addr = wqe->wr.wr.mw.addr;
 	mw->length = wqe->wr.wr.mw.length;
@@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ int rxe_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe)
 	struct rxe_dev *rxe = to_rdev(qp->ibqp.device);
 	u32 mw_rkey = wqe->wr.wr.mw.mw_rkey;
 	u32 mr_lkey = wqe->wr.wr.mw.mr_lkey;
+	int access = wqe->wr.wr.mw.access;
 
 	mw = rxe_pool_get_index(&rxe->mw_pool, mw_rkey >> 8);
 	if (unlikely(!mw)) {
@@ -198,11 +199,11 @@ int rxe_bind_mw(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_send_wqe *wqe)
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&mw->lock);
 
-	ret = rxe_check_bind_mw(qp, wqe, mw, mr);
+	ret = rxe_check_bind_mw(qp, wqe, mw, mr, access);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_unlock;
 
-	rxe_do_bind_mw(qp, wqe, mw, mr);
+	rxe_do_bind_mw(qp, wqe, mw, mr, access);
 err_unlock:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&mw->lock);
 err_drop_mr:
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-30 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 22:13 [PATCH for-next 0/6] Misc cleanups and implement rereg_user_mr Bob Pearson
2023-05-30 22:13 ` [PATCH for-next 1/6] RDMA/rxe: Rename IB_ACCESS_REMOTE Bob Pearson
2023-05-30 22:13 ` [PATCH for-next 2/6] rdma/rxe: Optimize send path in rxe_resp.c Bob Pearson
2023-05-30 22:13 ` Bob Pearson [this message]
2023-05-30 22:13 ` [PATCH for-next 4/6] RDMA/rxe: Introduce rxe access supported flags Bob Pearson
2023-05-30 22:13 ` [PATCH for-next 5/6] RDMA/rxe: Let rkey == lkey for local access Bob Pearson
2023-05-30 22:13 ` [PATCH for-next 6/6] RDMA/rxe: Implement rereg_user_mr Bob Pearson
2023-06-09 16:22 ` [PATCH for-next 0/6] Misc cleanups and implement rereg_user_mr Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230530221334.89432-4-rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --to=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).