From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Kamal Heib <kheib@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v1] RDMA/nldev: Add support for reporting ipoib netdev
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2023 09:30:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230918123026.GA13795@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230915183757.510557-1-kheib@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:37:57PM -0400, Kamal Heib wrote:
> This patch adds support for reporting the ipoib net device for a given
> RDMA device by calling ib_get_net_dev_by_params() when filling the
> port's info.
>
> $ rdma link show mlx5_0/1
> link mlx5_0/1 subnet_prefix fe80:0000:0000:0000 lid 66 sm_lid 3 lmc 0
> state ACTIVE physical_state LINK_UP netdev ibp196s0f0
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kheib@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1: Check namespace and query pkey.
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> index d5d3e4f0de77..f3fa8143cdc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/nldev.c
> @@ -308,10 +308,12 @@ static int fill_port_info(struct sk_buff *msg,
> struct ib_device *device, u32 port,
> const struct net *net)
> {
> + struct net_device *ipoib_netdev = NULL;
> struct net_device *netdev = NULL;
> struct ib_port_attr attr;
> - int ret;
> u64 cap_flags = 0;
> + u16 pkey;
> + int ret;
>
> if (fill_nldev_handle(msg, device))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> @@ -340,6 +342,26 @@ static int fill_port_info(struct sk_buff *msg,
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> if (nla_put_u8(msg, RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_LMC, attr.lmc))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> + ret = ib_query_pkey(device, port, 0, &pkey);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
That doesn't really make any sense..
The whole idea there is only one ipoib device doesn't even make sense.
I still don't like this at all.
> +
> + ipoib_netdev = ib_get_net_dev_by_params(device, port,
> + pkey,
> + NULL, NULL);
> + if (ipoib_netdev && net_eq(dev_net(ipoib_netdev), net)) {
> + ret = nla_put_u32(msg,
> + RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_NDEV_INDEX,
> + ipoib_netdev->ifindex);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
> + ret = nla_put_string(msg,
> + RDMA_NLDEV_ATTR_NDEV_NAME,
> + ipoib_netdev->name);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out;
and I don't think the existing netlink attributes should be redefined
to be about ipoib
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-18 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 18:37 [PATCH for-next v1] RDMA/nldev: Add support for reporting ipoib netdev Kamal Heib
2023-09-18 11:52 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-09-18 12:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230918123026.GA13795@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kheib@redhat.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox