From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Vitaly Mayatskikh <vitaly@enfabrica.net>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@enfabrica.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/core: use rdma_cap_iw_cm() in rdma_resolve_route()
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 08:44:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230920054452.GH4494@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF0Wxhkxa1Lk76nnkTQbNL6_v_4amczVd=wodPt00iOU2WB6+w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 04:08:38PM -0400, Vitaly Mayatskikh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:06 PM Vitaly Mayatskikh <vitaly@enfabrica.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 3:21 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I see that rdma_protocol_iwarp() is used in other places in cma.c too,
> > > Don't they need to be updated too?
> > >
> > > Also I see that we have check for protocol RoCE in else before the
> > > changed line, shouldn't all cma.c be changed to rdma_cap_*_cm() calls?
> > >
> > > 3376 else if (rdma_protocol_roce(id->device, id->port_num)) {
> >
> > I can't really judge, but looking around in the code it seems that
> > some if not all of
> > those cma.c functions that are checking for the protocol - they only
> > called from the
> > drivers that actually use the protocol. For example, iSER.
Just to make sure that we are using correct terminology - iSER is ULP
(upper layer protocol) and not driver.
> >
> > Our driver does not support iWarp, but implements IW_CM callbacks. The patch has
> > the only fix that was needed to make it work w/o a full blown iWarp.
It is hard to say without having driver in-tree and seeing the result of
ib_device_check_mandatory() in regards of kverbs_provider variable.
Does any existing in-tree driver require the proposed change in rdma-cm?
Thanks
>
> Ugh, adding everyone back...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-18 14:27 [PATCH] RDMA/core: use rdma_cap_iw_cm() in rdma_resolve_route() Vitaly Mayatskikh
2023-09-19 7:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <CAF0Wxh=YhKCLbOLZ+-b+_rmzRoWQtqoBGn6Bo9X3zR308Vm1zA@mail.gmail.com>
2023-09-19 20:08 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2023-09-20 5:44 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2023-09-20 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-20 13:07 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2023-09-20 13:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-20 13:53 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2023-09-20 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-09-20 14:24 ` Vitaly Mayatskikh
2023-09-20 16:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230920054452.GH4494@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@enfabrica.net \
--cc=shiraz.saleem@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly@enfabrica.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox