linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maor Gottlieb" <maorg@nvidia.com>,
	Mark Zhang <markzhang@nvidia.com>,
	"Michael Guralnik" <michaelgur@nvidia.com>,
	Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>,
	"Tamar Mashiah" <tmashiah@nvidia.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/6] Collection of mlx5_ib fixes
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:18:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240131091830.GD71813@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1706433934.git.leon@kernel.org>

On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 11:29:10AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

<...>

> Leon Romanovsky (1):
>   RDMA/mlx5: Fix fortify source warning while accessing Eth segment
> 
> Mark Zhang (1):
>   IB/mlx5: Don't expose debugfs entries for RRoCE general parameters if
>     not supported
>
> Yishai Hadas (1):
>   RDMA/mlx5: Relax DEVX access upon modify commands

Applied these patches to -rc.

>
> Or Har-Toov (3):
>   RDMA/mlx5: Uncacheable mkey has neither rb_key or cache_ent
>   RDMA/mlx5: Change check for cacheable user mkeys
>   RDMA/mlx5: Adding remote atomic access flag to updatable flags

These patches under discussion and will be needed to resend anyway.

Thanks

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-31  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-28  9:29 [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/6] Collection of mlx5_ib fixes Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 1/6] RDMA/mlx5: Fix fortify source warning while accessing Eth segment Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 2/6] IB/mlx5: Don't expose debugfs entries for RRoCE general parameters if not supported Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 3/6] RDMA/mlx5: Relax DEVX access upon modify commands Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 4/6] RDMA/mlx5: Uncacheable mkey has neither rb_key or cache_ent Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 5/6] RDMA/mlx5: Change check for cacheable user mkeys Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-29 17:52   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 13:47     ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-28  9:29 ` [PATCH rdma-next v1 6/6] RDMA/mlx5: Adding remote atomic access flag to updatable flags Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-31  9:16 ` (subset) [PATCH rdma-next v1 0/6] Collection of mlx5_ib fixes Leon Romanovsky
2024-01-31  9:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240131091830.GD71813@unreal \
    --to=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=edwards@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=markzhang@nvidia.com \
    --cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ohartoov@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tmashiah@nvidia.com \
    --cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).