linux-rdma.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andy Gospodarek <andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com>,
	Aron Silverton <aron.silverton@oracle.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Itay Avraham <itayavr@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Leonid Bloch <lbloch@nvidia.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] fwctl: Basic ioctl dispatch for the character device
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:02:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240823150207.000000e9@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2-v3-960f17f90f17+516-fwctl_jgg@nvidia.com>

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 15:10:54 -0300
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Each file descriptor gets a chunk of per-FD driver specific context that
> allows the driver to attach a device specific struct to. The core code
> takes care of the memory lifetime for this structure.
> 
> The ioctl dispatch and design is based on what was built for iommufd. The
> ioctls have a struct which has a combined in/out behavior with a typical
> 'zero pad' scheme for future extension and backwards compatibility.
> 
> Like iommufd some shared logic does most of the ioctl marshalling and
> compatibility work and tables diatches to some function pointers for
> each unique iotcl.
> 
> This approach has proven to work quite well in the iommufd and rdma
> subsystems.
> 
> Allocate an ioctl number space for the subsystem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,

A few minor things inline, but all trivial so
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/fwctl/main.c b/drivers/fwctl/main.c
> index 7f3e7713d0e6e9..f2e30ffc1e0cb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/fwctl/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/fwctl/main.c



>  
> @@ -71,6 +183,9 @@ _alloc_device(struct device *parent, const struct fwctl_ops *ops, size_t size)
>  
>  	fwctl->dev.class = &fwctl_class;
>  	fwctl->dev.parent = parent;
> +	init_rwsem(&fwctl->registration_lock);
> +	mutex_init(&fwctl->uctx_list_lock);

If the ida_alloc_max() fails,I don't think you destroy the mutex as the
device isn't yet initialized / put in the error path.

Whilst i find it hard to care, it's nice to always destroy mutex, or not do it at all.
Feels odd to only do it if things go well.

> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fwctl->uctx_list);
>  
>  	devnum = ida_alloc_max(&fwctl_ida, FWCTL_MAX_DEVICES - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (devnum < 0)
> @@ -127,6 +242,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(fwctl_register, FWCTL);
>   * Undoes fwctl_register(). On return no driver ops will be called. The
>   * caller must still call fwctl_put() to free the fwctl.
>   *
> + * Unregister will return even if userspace still has file descriptors open.
> + * This will call ops->close_uctx() on any open FDs and after return no driver
> + * op will be called. The FDs remain open but all fops will return -ENODEV.
> + *
>   * The design of fwctl allows this sort of disassociation of the driver from the
>   * subsystem primarily by keeping memory allocations owned by the core subsytem.
>   * The fwctl_device and fwctl_uctx can both be freed without requiring a driver
> @@ -134,7 +253,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(fwctl_register, FWCTL);
>   */
>  void fwctl_unregister(struct fwctl_device *fwctl)
>  {
> +	struct fwctl_uctx *uctx;
> +
>  	cdev_device_del(&fwctl->cdev, &fwctl->dev);
> +
> +	/* Disable and free the driver's resources for any still open FDs. */
> +	guard(rwsem_write)(&fwctl->registration_lock);
> +	guard(mutex)(&fwctl->uctx_list_lock);
> +	while ((uctx = list_first_entry_or_null(&fwctl->uctx_list,
> +						struct fwctl_uctx,
> +						uctx_list_entry)))
> +		fwctl_destroy_uctx(uctx);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The driver module may unload after this returns, the op pointer will
> +	 * not be valid.
> +	 */
> +	fwctl->ops = NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(fwctl_unregister, FWCTL);
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/fwctl.h b/include/linux/fwctl.h
> index 68ac2d5ab87481..ca4245825e91bf 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fwctl.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fwctl.h

>  
>  /**
> @@ -26,6 +49,15 @@ struct fwctl_device {
>  	struct device dev;
>  	/* private: */
>  	struct cdev cdev;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Protect ops, held for write when ops becomes NULL during unregister,
> +	 * held for read whenver ops is loaded or an ops function is running.
> +	 */
> +	struct rw_semaphore registration_lock;

Maybe move down to just above ops?

> +	/* Protect uctx_list */
> +	struct mutex uctx_list_lock;
> +	struct list_head uctx_list;
>  	const struct fwctl_ops *ops;
>  };

> diff --git a/include/uapi/fwctl/fwctl.h b/include/uapi/fwctl/fwctl.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000000..22fa750d7e8184
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/uapi/fwctl/fwctl.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2024, NVIDIA CORPORATION & AFFILIATES.
> + */
> +#ifndef _UAPI_FWCTL_H
> +#define _UAPI_FWCTL_H
> +
> +#define FWCTL_TYPE 0x9A
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: General ioctl format
> + *
> + * The ioctl interface follows a general format to allow for extensibility. Each
> + * ioctl is passed in a structure pointer as the argument providing the size of
Pedantic Englishman time:
passed a structure pointer

(otherwise I read that as passing an ioctl in a pointer which is weird).

> + * the structure in the first u32. The kernel checks that any structure space 
...



  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-23 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-21 18:10 [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce fwctl subystem Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] fwctl: Add basic structure for a class subsystem with a cdev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 13:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] fwctl: Basic ioctl dispatch for the character device Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 14:02   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-27 14:56     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] fwctl: FWCTL_INFO to return basic information about the device Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 14:14   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 14:47     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-27 14:55       ` Andy Gospodarek
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] taint: Add TAINT_FWCTL Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 23:35   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-08-22 15:34     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] fwctl: FWCTL_RPC to execute a Remote Procedure Call to device firmware Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 23:49   ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-22  0:14     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-22  0:30       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-27 15:27         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 14:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] fwctl: Add documentation Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 14:35   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 14:58     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:10 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] fwctl/mlx5: Support for communicating with mlx5 fw Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-23 14:48   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 15:07     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mlx5: Create an auxiliary device for fwctl_mlx5 Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] fwctl/cxl: Add driver for CXL mailbox for handling CXL features commands (RFC) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-08-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] cxl: Create an auxiliary device for fwctl_cxl Jason Gunthorpe
2024-09-13 22:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Introduce fwctl subystem Dave Jiang
2024-09-16  7:54   ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-09-17 20:59   ` Dave Jiang
2024-12-05 22:28 ` Shannon Nelson
2024-12-05 23:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240823150207.000000e9@Huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
    --cc=aron.silverton@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=itayavr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).