From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF73188599; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 09:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730366959; cv=none; b=q7ofCePxn49QDRdYuKH1QDHPIJ3N/p4atW6V+HmyY1FyThlt+xJ3X+lTkccs6AYPQaQjKR/OiZBDvUBsFKw3LwXAauomwk9yZm8bMQKAyd5z9DmC3td3CGyPqTh/dDsgkqGrGOnnCtKcj90cIDCtmVcVoOXkPOCHa/vvD56D1Uo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730366959; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dZHxgnrIkdMO2LldTpzDLOjBpT2bck5vMllRHMoj9aE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FGdN975s6lLsgRr5pj2lIBInFqIUPl+Sw1HYSnyOX0mGGJ/Eql8Ke/Y4qnY4BYAX0r8PSX98vmZqcXHBWbWxeSslzIybmpaf03ELJngZLWuDU6Xj/R4fV46MAgcU28uicyGKaMYWGHRNSp1ZcftJloPhJ1DHze1vjIoS6uQOWtc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 0872F68B05; Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:21:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 10:21:13 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Jason Gunthorpe , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Sagi Grimberg , Keith Busch , Bjorn Helgaas , Logan Gunthorpe , Yishai Hadas , Shameer Kolothum , Kevin Tian , Alex Williamson , Marek Szyprowski , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/17] Provide a new two step DMA mapping API Message-ID: <20241031092113.GA1791@lst.de> References: <3144b6e7-5c80-46d2-8ddc-a71af3c23072@kernel.dk> <20241031083450.GA30625@lst.de> <20241031090530.GC7473@unreal> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241031090530.GC7473@unreal> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:05:30AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > This series is a subset of the series you tested and doesn't include the > block layer changes which most likely were the cause of the performance > regression. > > This is why I separated the block layer changes from the rest of the series > and marked them as RFC. > > The current patch set is viable for HMM and VFIO. Can you please retest > only this series and leave the block layer changes for later till Christoph > finds the answer for the performance regression? As the subset doesn't touch block code or code called by block I don't think we need Jens to benchmark it, unless he really wants to.