From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com,
kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [rdma-next 5/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Add new function to setup NQs
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 12:34:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112103429.GK71181@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+sbYW2BAUXLyk0Fa_hmXoQ1e7Ocmj-jw41JNBmjJQupimaD8Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 02:55:12PM +0530, Selvin Xavier wrote:
> +Michael Chan
>
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 1:47 PM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 12:42:39AM -0800, Selvin Xavier wrote:
> > > From: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
> > >
> > > Move the logic to setup and enable NQs to a new function.
> > > Similarly moved the NQ cleanup logic to a common function.
> > > Introdued a flag to keep track of NQ allocation status
> > > and added sanity checks inside bnxt_re_stop_irq() and
> > > bnxt_re_start_irq() to avoid possible race conditions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/bnxt_re.h | 2 +
> > > drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/main.c | 204 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > >
> > > + rtnl_lock();
> > > + if (test_and_clear_bit(BNXT_RE_FLAG_SETUP_NQ, &rdev->flags))
> > > + bnxt_re_clean_nqs(rdev);
> > > + rtnl_unlock();
> >
> > <...>
> >
> > > + rtnl_lock();
> > > bnxt_qplib_free_ctx(&rdev->qplib_res, &rdev->qplib_ctx);
> > > bnxt_qplib_disable_rcfw_channel(&rdev->rcfw);
> > > type = bnxt_qplib_get_ring_type(rdev->chip_ctx);
> > > bnxt_re_net_ring_free(rdev, rdev->rcfw.creq.ring_id, type);
> > > + rtnl_unlock();
> >
> > Please don't add rtnl_lock() to drivers in RDMA subsystem. BNXT driver
> > is managed through netdev and it is there all proper locking should be
> > done.
> The main reason for bnxt_re to take the rtnl is because of the MSIx
> resource configuration.
> This is because the NIC driver is dynamically modifying the MSIx table
> when the number
> of ring change or ndo->open/close is invoked. So we stop and restart
> the interrupts of RoCE also with rtnl held.
rtnl_lock is a big kernel lock, which blocks almost everything in the netdev.
In your case, you are changing one device configuration and should use
your per-device locks. Even in the system with more than one BNXT device,
the MSI-X on one device will influence other "innocent" devices.
> >
> > Please work to remove existing rtnl_lock() from bnxt_re_update_en_info_rdev() too.
> > IMHO that lock is not needed after your driver conversion to auxbus.
> This check is also to synchronize between the irq_stop and restart
> implementation between
> bnxt_en and bnxt_re driver and roce driver unload.
>
> We will review this locking and see if we can handle it. But it is a
> major design change in both L2
> and roce drivers.
You are adding new rtnl_lock and not moving it from one place to
another, so this redesign should be done together with this new
feature.
Thanks
> >
> > Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 8:42 [rdma-next 0/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor Notification queue allocation Selvin Xavier
2024-11-08 8:42 ` [rdma-next 1/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fail probe early when not enough MSI-x vectors are reserved Selvin Xavier
2024-11-08 8:42 ` [rdma-next 2/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refactor NQ allocation Selvin Xavier
2024-11-08 8:42 ` [rdma-next 3/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Refurbish CQ to NQ hash calculation Selvin Xavier
2024-11-08 8:42 ` [rdma-next 4/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Cache MSIx info to a local structure Selvin Xavier
2024-11-08 8:42 ` [rdma-next 5/5] RDMA/bnxt_re: Add new function to setup NQs Selvin Xavier
2024-11-12 8:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2024-11-12 9:25 ` Selvin Xavier
2024-11-12 10:34 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2024-11-13 5:44 ` Selvin Xavier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112103429.GK71181@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox