From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"Andrew Lunn" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Cc: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/10] devlink: Serialize access to rate domains
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 20:01:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213180134.323929-4-tariqt@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213180134.323929-1-tariqt@nvidia.com>
From: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Access to rates in a rate domain should be serialized.
This commit introduces two new functions, devl_rate_domain_lock and
devl_rate_domain_unlock, and uses them whenever serial access to a rate
domain is needed. For now, they are no-ops since access to a rate domain
is protected by the devlink lock.
Signed-off-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
---
net/devlink/devl_internal.h | 4 ++
net/devlink/rate.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
2 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
index 209b4a4c7070..fae81dd6953f 100644
--- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
+++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ static inline void devl_dev_unlock(struct devlink *devlink, bool dev_lock)
device_unlock(devlink->dev);
}
+static inline void devl_rate_domain_lock(struct devlink *devlink) { }
+
+static inline void devl_rate_domain_unlock(struct devlink *devlink) { }
+
typedef void devlink_rel_notify_cb_t(struct devlink *devlink, u32 obj_index);
typedef void devlink_rel_cleanup_cb_t(struct devlink *devlink, u32 obj_index,
u32 rel_index);
diff --git a/net/devlink/rate.c b/net/devlink/rate.c
index 535863bb0c17..54e6a9893e3d 100644
--- a/net/devlink/rate.c
+++ b/net/devlink/rate.c
@@ -167,18 +167,22 @@ void devlink_rates_notify_register(struct devlink *devlink)
{
struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry(rate_node, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list)
if (rate_node->devlink == devlink)
devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
}
void devlink_rates_notify_unregister(struct devlink *devlink)
{
struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(rate_node, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list)
if (rate_node->devlink == devlink)
devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
}
static int
@@ -190,6 +194,7 @@ devlink_nl_rate_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
int idx = 0;
int err = 0;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list) {
enum devlink_command cmd = DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW;
u32 id = NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid;
@@ -209,6 +214,7 @@ devlink_nl_rate_get_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct devlink *devlink,
}
idx++;
}
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
@@ -225,23 +231,33 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_get_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct sk_buff *msg;
int err;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
devlink_rate = devlink_rate_get_from_info(devlink, info);
- if (IS_ERR(devlink_rate))
- return PTR_ERR(devlink_rate);
+ if (IS_ERR(devlink_rate)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(devlink_rate);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
msg = nlmsg_new(NLMSG_DEFAULT_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!msg)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!msg) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
err = devlink_nl_rate_fill(msg, devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW,
info->snd_portid, info->snd_seq, 0,
info->extack);
- if (err) {
- nlmsg_free(msg);
- return err;
- }
+ if (err)
+ goto err_fill;
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return genlmsg_reply(msg, info);
+
+err_fill:
+ nlmsg_free(msg);
+unlock:
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
+ return err;
}
static bool
@@ -470,18 +486,24 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
const struct devlink_ops *ops;
int err;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
devlink_rate = devlink_rate_get_from_info(devlink, info);
- if (IS_ERR(devlink_rate))
- return PTR_ERR(devlink_rate);
+ if (IS_ERR(devlink_rate)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(devlink_rate);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
ops = devlink->ops;
- if (!ops || !devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(ops, info, devlink_rate->type))
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (!ops || !devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(ops, info, devlink_rate->type)) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
err = devlink_nl_rate_set(devlink_rate, ops, info);
-
if (!err)
devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+unlock:
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
@@ -501,15 +523,21 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
if (!devlink_rate_set_ops_supported(ops, info, DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_from_attrs(devlink, info->attrs);
- if (!IS_ERR(rate_node))
- return -EEXIST;
- else if (rate_node == ERR_PTR(-EINVAL))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!IS_ERR(rate_node)) {
+ err = -EEXIST;
+ goto unlock;
+ } else if (rate_node == ERR_PTR(-EINVAL)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
rate_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*rate_node), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rate_node)
- return -ENOMEM;
+ if (!rate_node) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
rate_node->devlink = devlink;
rate_node->type = DEVLINK_RATE_TYPE_NODE;
@@ -530,6 +558,7 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
refcount_set(&rate_node->refcnt, 1);
list_add(&rate_node->list, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list);
devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return 0;
err_rate_set:
@@ -538,6 +567,8 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_new_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
kfree(rate_node->name);
err_strdup:
kfree(rate_node);
+unlock:
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
@@ -547,13 +578,17 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
int err;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_from_info(devlink, info);
- if (IS_ERR(rate_node))
- return PTR_ERR(rate_node);
+ if (IS_ERR(rate_node)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(rate_node);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
if (refcount_read(&rate_node->refcnt) > 1) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(info->extack, "Node has children. Cannot delete node.");
- return -EBUSY;
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto unlock;
}
devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
@@ -564,20 +599,26 @@ int devlink_nl_rate_del_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
list_del(&rate_node->list);
kfree(rate_node->name);
kfree(rate_node);
+unlock:
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return err;
}
int devlink_rate_nodes_check(struct devlink *devlink, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct devlink_rate *devlink_rate;
+ int err = 0;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list)
if (devlink_rate->devlink == devlink &&
devlink_rate_is_node(devlink_rate)) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Rate node(s) exists.");
- return -EBUSY;
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ break;
}
- return 0;
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
+ return err;
}
/**
@@ -595,13 +636,19 @@ devl_rate_node_create(struct devlink *devlink, void *priv, char *node_name,
{
struct devlink_rate *rate_node;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
+
rate_node = devlink_rate_node_get_by_name(devlink, node_name);
- if (!IS_ERR(rate_node))
- return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
+ if (!IS_ERR(rate_node)) {
+ rate_node = ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
rate_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*rate_node), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!rate_node)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ if (!rate_node) {
+ rate_node = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
if (parent) {
rate_node->parent = parent;
@@ -615,12 +662,15 @@ devl_rate_node_create(struct devlink *devlink, void *priv, char *node_name,
rate_node->name = kstrdup(node_name, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rate_node->name) {
kfree(rate_node);
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ rate_node = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ goto unlock;
}
refcount_set(&rate_node->refcnt, 1);
list_add(&rate_node->list, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list);
devlink_rate_notify(rate_node, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+unlock:
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return rate_node;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_node_create);
@@ -648,6 +698,7 @@ int devl_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv,
if (!devlink_rate)
return -ENOMEM;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
if (parent) {
devlink_rate->parent = parent;
refcount_inc(&devlink_rate->parent->refcnt);
@@ -660,6 +711,7 @@ int devl_rate_leaf_create(struct devlink_port *devlink_port, void *priv,
list_add_tail(&devlink_rate->list, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list);
devlink_port->devlink_rate = devlink_rate;
devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_NEW);
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
return 0;
}
@@ -680,11 +732,13 @@ void devl_rate_leaf_destroy(struct devlink_port *devlink_port)
if (!devlink_rate)
return;
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink_port->devlink);
devlink_rate_notify(devlink_rate, DEVLINK_CMD_RATE_DEL);
if (devlink_rate->parent)
refcount_dec(&devlink_rate->parent->refcnt);
list_del(&devlink_rate->list);
devlink_port->devlink_rate = NULL;
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink_port->devlink);
kfree(devlink_rate);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_leaf_destroy);
@@ -702,6 +756,7 @@ void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
const struct devlink_ops *ops = devlink->ops;
devl_assert_locked(devlink);
+ devl_rate_domain_lock(devlink);
list_for_each_entry(devlink_rate, &devlink->rate_domain->rate_list, list) {
if (!devlink_rate->parent || devlink_rate->devlink != devlink)
@@ -723,5 +778,6 @@ void devl_rate_nodes_destroy(struct devlink *devlink)
kfree(devlink_rate);
}
}
+ devl_rate_domain_unlock(devlink);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devl_rate_nodes_destroy);
--
2.45.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 18:01 [PATCH net-next 00/10] devlink and mlx5: Introduce rate domains Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 01/10] devlink: Remove unused param of devlink_rate_nodes_check Tariq Toukan
2025-02-18 2:54 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 02/10] devlink: Store devlink rates in a rate domain Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2025-02-14 12:54 ` [PATCH net-next 03/10] devlink: Serialize access to rate domains Jiri Pirko
2025-02-19 2:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-25 13:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-02-26 1:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-26 14:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-02-27 2:53 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-27 12:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-03-03 22:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-04 13:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-03-05 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-05 11:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 04/10] devlink: Introduce shared " Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 05/10] devlink: Allow specifying parent device for rate commands Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 06/10] devlink: Allow rate node parents from other devlinks Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 07/10] net/mlx5: qos: Introduce shared esw qos domains Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 08/10] net/mlx5: qos: Support cross-esw tx scheduling Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 09/10] net/mlx5: qos: Init shared devlink rate domain Tariq Toukan
2025-02-13 18:01 ` [PATCH net-next 10/10] net/mlx5: Document devlink rates and cross-esw scheduling Tariq Toukan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250213180134.323929-4-tariqt@nvidia.com \
--to=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox