From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C21922DF83 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741766163; cv=none; b=KBkN+DOKVhYhdyG+ufM7dH7smVBdHm0EICuW34RMnGN/vqXtyQXsyFNzS5CV2FsfE1HwPbxZYe/nd/RbdKq4GQFScPFAXuudPVdY/lWRUjs/CTfnbFGyDOAAnl4XmYI8ytZXRlGCanO2FoHwbsAu0TfXNwL5f+WnNsCZ3h7JdBU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741766163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BAtR3tzpsGfKBLd1V9FOHO2xVMMAacf2DP5E4jiuhcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=t8EgH7FjbHQpgb37SzJB/AMolclYH3WH5Cyby1GxoyLLCG/YxkYRNzoPGXQ5D8bDNDhEyOg+PpNTocx4Mq74AqJVyKOoHKt4OmPxKzuaDCV2eiRZ1KN5qPET+yJlPGhlzF1EISNb6hCp6mw92jElUUkFNaShemFg2/6Mhvgp/0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=EBPdtlUq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EBPdtlUq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741766160; x=1773302160; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=BAtR3tzpsGfKBLd1V9FOHO2xVMMAacf2DP5E4jiuhcQ=; b=EBPdtlUq3DpkzCrMM4Qf6x6bBiBC5mzZa2OmLzasY9M8MDdL2vzqsoRY V8v/4CAZYXT7UcujXfTGkjvzxSEg2x9sd5SSeWBYi7JRrgi9XVLJnag82 HXWiSCw7lLIeE5P1rNRWjkrT2VZfe78pr9uRtA/y2fECZEWHgPQXyiM+J K3TBDh/HrZVw1HEHrIcF7jLt8x2VrCOyH4vGBhA+M+1XZDioltIV17rQn oOSaeo7T7UtwBK+KnKHDAffDW6hAGjCjmmvgeOfpeqqtpedqR4blfDcKI fhwR+e+iNb5jtHkD6/PH/4Q7dKx8KPvs1RTTS56F9AvtHOhg2EIJlNEeX A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IL2U00RHSs6zUScfdot7gQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 0nkdjbJAQCGB8htTCYXc4g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11370"; a="42745489" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,241,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="42745489" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Mar 2025 00:56:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5gcEABVfRsesJz+sMDHt8A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: UqBupuIVThmnR5o4tcMEmA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,241,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="157755009" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO a4747d147074) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2025 00:55:57 -0700 Received: from kbuild by a4747d147074 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tsGwU-0008FI-28; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:55:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:55:51 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Selvin Xavier , leon@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, andrew.gospodarek@broadcom.com, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com, Preethi G , Selvin Xavier Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/bnxt_re: Support Perf management counters Message-ID: <202503121530.oThTZxSC-lkp@intel.com> References: <1741674104-5477-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1741674104-5477-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier@broadcom.com> Hi Selvin, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on rdma/for-next] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.14-rc6 next-20250311] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Selvin-Xavier/RDMA-bnxt_re-Support-Perf-management-counters/20250311-144413 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1741674104-5477-1-git-send-email-selvin.xavier%40broadcom.com patch subject: [PATCH rdma-next] RDMA/bnxt_re: Support Perf management counters config: s390-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250312/202503121530.oThTZxSC-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250312/202503121530.oThTZxSC-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503121530.oThTZxSC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c: In function 'bnxt_re_assign_pma_port_ext_counters': >> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c:295:13: warning: variable 'rc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 295 | int rc; | ^~ drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c: In function 'bnxt_re_assign_pma_port_counters': drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c:338:13: warning: variable 'rc' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 338 | int rc; | ^~ vim +/rc +295 drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c 289 290 int bnxt_re_assign_pma_port_ext_counters(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev, struct ib_mad *out_mad) 291 { 292 struct ib_pma_portcounters_ext *pma_cnt_ext; 293 struct bnxt_qplib_ext_stat *estat = &rdev->stats.rstat.ext_stat; 294 struct ctx_hw_stats *hw_stats = NULL; > 295 int rc; 296 297 hw_stats = rdev->qplib_ctx.stats.dma; 298 299 pma_cnt_ext = (void *)(out_mad->data + 40); 300 if (_is_ext_stats_supported(rdev->dev_attr->dev_cap_flags)) { 301 u32 fid = PCI_FUNC(rdev->en_dev->pdev->devfn); 302 303 rc = bnxt_qplib_qext_stat(&rdev->rcfw, fid, estat); 304 } 305 306 pma_cnt_ext = (void *)(out_mad->data + 40); 307 if ((bnxt_qplib_is_chip_gen_p5(rdev->chip_ctx) && rdev->is_virtfn) || 308 !bnxt_qplib_is_chip_gen_p5(rdev->chip_ctx)) { 309 pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_data = 310 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes) / 4); 311 pma_cnt_ext->port_rcv_data = 312 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->rx_ucast_bytes) / 4); 313 pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_packets = 314 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->tx_ucast_pkts)); 315 pma_cnt_ext->port_rcv_packets = 316 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->rx_ucast_pkts)); 317 pma_cnt_ext->port_unicast_rcv_packets = 318 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->rx_ucast_pkts)); 319 pma_cnt_ext->port_unicast_xmit_packets = 320 cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->tx_ucast_pkts)); 321 322 } else { 323 pma_cnt_ext->port_rcv_packets = cpu_to_be64(estat->rx_roce_good_pkts); 324 pma_cnt_ext->port_rcv_data = cpu_to_be64(estat->rx_roce_good_bytes / 4); 325 pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_packets = cpu_to_be64(estat->tx_roce_pkts); 326 pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_data = cpu_to_be64(estat->tx_roce_bytes / 4); 327 pma_cnt_ext->port_unicast_rcv_packets = cpu_to_be64(estat->rx_roce_good_pkts); 328 pma_cnt_ext->port_unicast_xmit_packets = cpu_to_be64(estat->tx_roce_pkts); 329 } 330 return 0; 331 } 332 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki