From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)" <matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: RDMA FLUSH and ATOMIC WRITE with ODP
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2025 20:55:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250411175528.GX199604@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OS3PR01MB986530139AE70B2D0BB6C111E5B62@OS3PR01MB9865.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 08:13:59AM +0000, Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> I have noticed the 2nd patch caused "kernel test robot" error, and you
> kindly amended the patch. However, another error has been detected by "the bot"
> because of the remaining fundamental problem that ATOMIC WRITE cannot
> be executed on non-64-bit architectures (at least on rxe).
>
> I think applying the change below to the original patch(*1) will resolve the issue.
> (*1) https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20250324075649.3313968-3-matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com/
> ```
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> index 02de05d759c6..ac3b3039db22 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_odp.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ int rxe_odp_flush_pmem_iova(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova,
> }
>
> /* CONFIG_64BIT=y */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> enum resp_states rxe_odp_do_atomic_write(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova, u64 value)
> {
> struct ib_umem_odp *umem_odp = to_ib_umem_odp(mr->umem);
> @@ -424,3 +425,4 @@ enum resp_states rxe_odp_do_atomic_write(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova, u64 value)
>
> return RESPST_NONE;
> }
> +#endif
> ```
> The definition of rxe_odp_do_atomic_write() should have been guarded in #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT.
> I believe this fix can address both:
> - the first error "error: redefinition of 'rxe_odp_do_atomic_write' " that could be caused when
> CONFIG_INFINIBAND_ON_DEMAND_PAGING=y && CONFIG_64BIT=n.
> - the second error caused by trying to compile 64-bit codes on 32-bit architectures.
>
> I am very sorry to bother you, but is it possible to make the modification?
> If I should provide a replacement patch, I will do so.
I think that better will be simply make sure that RXE is dependent on 64bits.
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/Kconfig
index c180e7ebcfc5..1ed5b63f8afc 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/Kconfig
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
config RDMA_RXE
tristate "Software RDMA over Ethernet (RoCE) driver"
- depends on INET && PCI && INFINIBAND
+ depends on INET && PCI && INFINIBAND && 64BIT
depends on INFINIBAND_VIRT_DMA
select NET_UDP_TUNNEL
select CRC32
WDYT?
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Daisuke
>
> On Tue, April 8, 2025 8:12 PM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 16:56:47 +0900, Daisuke Matsuda wrote:
> > > RDMA FLUSH[1] and ATOMIC WRITE[2] were added to rxe, but they cannot run
> > > in the ODP mode as of now. This series is for the kernel-side enablement.
> > >
> > > There are also minor changes in libibverbs and pyverbs. The rdma-core tests
> > > are also added so that people can test the features.
> > > PR: https://github.com/linux-rdma/rdma-core/pull/1580
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied, thanks!
> >
> > [1/2] RDMA/rxe: Enable ODP in RDMA FLUSH operation
> > https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/32cad6aab9a699
> > [2/2] RDMA/rxe: Enable ODP in ATOMIC WRITE operation
> > https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/3e2746e0863f48
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-11 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-24 7:56 [PATCH for-next v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: RDMA FLUSH and ATOMIC WRITE with ODP Daisuke Matsuda
2025-03-24 7:56 ` [PATCH for-next v3 1/2] RDMA/rxe: Enable ODP in RDMA FLUSH operation Daisuke Matsuda
2025-03-24 7:56 ` [PATCH for-next v3 2/2] RDMA/rxe: Enable ODP in ATOMIC WRITE operation Daisuke Matsuda
2025-04-08 11:11 ` [PATCH for-next v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: RDMA FLUSH and ATOMIC WRITE with ODP Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-08 11:11 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-11 8:13 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2025-04-11 17:55 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-04-14 10:16 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2025-04-14 12:56 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-04-16 16:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-18 2:07 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
2025-04-18 11:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-04-20 23:31 ` Daisuke Matsuda (Fujitsu)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250411175528.GX199604@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox