From: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
To: <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<parav@nvidia.com>, <cratiu@nvidia.com>, <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>,
<edwards@nvidia.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>, <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
<mbloch@nvidia.com>, <gal@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2025 19:08:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250907160833.56589-2-edwards@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250907160833.56589-1-edwards@nvidia.com>
From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
In order to reduce dependencies in IFF_LOOPBACK in
route and neighbour resolution steps, squash the
static function to its single caller and simplify the
code. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Srouji <edwards@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c | 49 ++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
index be0743dac3ff..594e7ee335f7 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c
@@ -465,34 +465,6 @@ static int addr_resolve_neigh(const struct dst_entry *dst,
return ret;
}
-static int copy_src_l2_addr(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
- const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
- const struct dst_entry *dst,
- const struct net_device *ndev)
-{
- int ret = 0;
-
- if (dst->dev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK)
- ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
- else
- rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
-
- /*
- * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
- * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
- * network type accordingly.
- */
- if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
- ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
- dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
- RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
- RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
- else
- dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
unsigned int *ndev_flags,
const struct sockaddr *dst_in,
@@ -503,6 +475,7 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
*ndev_flags = ndev->flags;
/* A physical device must be the RDMA device to use */
if (ndev->flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) {
+ int ret;
/*
* RDMA (IB/RoCE, iWarp) doesn't run on lo interface or
* loopback IP address. So if route is resolved to loopback
@@ -512,9 +485,27 @@ static int rdma_set_src_addr_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr,
ndev = rdma_find_ndev_for_src_ip_rcu(dev_net(ndev), dst_in);
if (IS_ERR(ndev))
return -ENODEV;
+ ret = rdma_translate_ip(dst_in, dev_addr);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ rdma_copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst->dev);
}
- return copy_src_l2_addr(dev_addr, dst_in, dst, ndev);
+ /*
+ * If there's a gateway and type of device not ARPHRD_INFINIBAND,
+ * we're definitely in RoCE v2 (as RoCE v1 isn't routable) set the
+ * network type accordingly.
+ */
+ if (has_gateway(dst, dst_in->sa_family) &&
+ ndev->type != ARPHRD_INFINIBAND)
+ dev_addr->network = dst_in->sa_family == AF_INET ?
+ RDMA_NETWORK_IPV4 :
+ RDMA_NETWORK_IPV6;
+ else
+ dev_addr->network = RDMA_NETWORK_IB;
+
+ return 0;
}
static int set_addr_netns_by_gid_rcu(struct rdma_dev_addr *addr)
--
2.21.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-07 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-07 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` Edward Srouji [this message]
2025-09-10 8:17 ` [PATCH 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:51 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-10 12:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-10 8:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-09-10 10:55 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-15 16:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-15 17:16 ` Parav Pandit
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-07 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] RDMA/core: Squash a single user static function Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] RDMA/core: Resolve MAC of next-hop device without ARP support Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] RDMA/core: Use route entry flag to decide on loopback traffic Edward Srouji
2025-09-16 11:11 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] IB/ipoib: Ignore L3 master device Edward Srouji
2025-09-18 9:24 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] Fix local destination address resolution with VRF Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250907160833.56589-2-edwards@nvidia.com \
--to=edwards@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=vdumitrescu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox