From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: "Håkon Bugge" <haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Sean Hefty <shefty@nvidia.com>,
Vlad Dumitrescu <vdumitrescu@nvidia.com>,
Or Har-Toov <ohartoov@nvidia.com>,
Jacob Moroni <jmoroni@google.com>,
Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@oracle.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cm: Base cm_id destruction timeout on CMA values
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 13:36:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251027113636.GI12554@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251021132738.4179604-1-haakon.bugge@oracle.com>
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 03:27:33PM +0200, Håkon Bugge wrote:
> When a GSI MAD packet is sent on the QP, it will potentially be
> retried CMA_MAX_CM_RETRIES times with a timeout value of:
>
> 4.096usec * 2 ^ CMA_CM_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT
>
> The above equates to ~64 seconds using the default CMA values.
>
> The cm_id_priv's refcount will be incremented for this period.
> Therefore, the timeout value waiting for a cm_id destruction must be
> based on the effective timeout of MAD packets. To provide additional
> leeway, we add 25% to this timeout and use that instead of the
> constant 10 seconds timeout, which may result in false negatives.
>
> Fixes: 96d9cbe2f2ff ("RDMA/cm: add timeout to cm_destroy_id wait")
I applied and removed this Fixes line. Most likely someone will complain
that this patch breaks his flow.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-21 13:27 [PATCH for-next] RDMA/cm: Base cm_id destruction timeout on CMA values Håkon Bugge
2025-10-27 11:36 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-10-27 11:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-10-28 12:28 ` Haakon Bugge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251027113636.GI12554@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=haakon.bugge@oracle.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jmoroni@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manjunath.b.patil@oracle.com \
--cc=ohartoov@nvidia.com \
--cc=shefty@nvidia.com \
--cc=vdumitrescu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox