From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] hfi1: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2025 17:31:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251101163121.78400-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251101163121.78400-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
This lack of consistentcy cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.
alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound
workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND.
This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues,
allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they’re needed and
reducing noise when CPUs are isolated.
This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request
alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.
With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND),
any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn’t explicitly specify WQ_UNBOUND
must now use WQ_PERCPU.
Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will
become the implicit default.
CC: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Suggested-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@suse.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c | 4 ++--
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
index b35f92e7d865..e4aef102dac0 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
@@ -745,8 +745,8 @@ static int create_workqueues(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
ppd->hfi1_wq =
alloc_workqueue(
"hfi%d_%d",
- WQ_SYSFS | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE |
- WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
+ WQ_SYSFS | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
+ WQ_PERCPU,
HFI1_MAX_ACTIVE_WORKQUEUE_ENTRIES,
dd->unit, pidx);
if (!ppd->hfi1_wq)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c
index 370a5a8eaa71..6e0e3458d202 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c
@@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ void opfn_trigger_conn_request(struct rvt_qp *qp, u32 bth1)
int opfn_init(void)
{
opfn_wq = alloc_workqueue("hfi_opfn",
- WQ_SYSFS | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE |
- WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
+ WQ_SYSFS | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM |
+ WQ_PERCPU,
HFI1_MAX_ACTIVE_WORKQUEUE_ENTRIES);
if (!opfn_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-01 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-01 16:31 [PATCH 0/5] replaced system_unbound_wq, added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-11-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/5] RDMA/core: RDMA/mlx5: replace use of system_unbound_wq with system_dfl_wq Marco Crivellari
2025-11-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/5] RDMA/core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users Marco Crivellari
2025-11-01 16:31 ` Marco Crivellari [this message]
2025-11-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/5] RDMA/mlx4: " Marco Crivellari
2025-11-01 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/5] IB/rdmavt: " Marco Crivellari
2025-12-02 13:22 ` [PATCH 0/5] replaced system_unbound_wq, added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue Marco Crivellari
2025-12-02 19:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-12-03 13:46 ` Marco Crivellari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251101163121.78400-4-marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--to=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox