From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
Cc: Selvin Xavier <selvin.xavier@broadcom.com>,
Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 17:18:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251218151851.GA400630@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251210131528.569382-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 02:15:29PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Replace cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu()) with swab64() to simplify
> bnxt_re_assign_pma_port_ext_counters(). No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> index 651cf9d0e0c7..bb1137ad84c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/hw_counters.c
> @@ -290,19 +290,12 @@ int bnxt_re_assign_pma_port_ext_counters(struct bnxt_re_dev *rdev, struct ib_mad
> pma_cnt_ext = (struct ib_pma_portcounters_ext *)(out_mad->data + 40);
> if ((bnxt_qplib_is_chip_gen_p5(rdev->chip_ctx) && rdev->is_virtfn) ||
> !bnxt_qplib_is_chip_gen_p5(rdev->chip_ctx)) {
> - pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_data =
> - cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes) / 4);
> + pma_cnt_ext->port_xmit_data = swab64(hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes / 4);
Why do you think that the above two lines are equal?
hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes is __le64 value and le64_to_cpu(hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes) / 4) is not equal to
hw_stats->tx_ucast_bytes / 4.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-10 13:15 [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64 Thorsten Blum
2025-12-18 15:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251218151851.GA400630@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
--cc=thorsten.blum@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox