public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Cc: somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com,
	jgg@ziepe.ca, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com,
	selvin.xavier@broadcom.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix IB_SEND_IP_CSUM handling in post_send
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 11:42:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221094223.GH13030@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219093308.2415620-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>

On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 01:32:57AM -0800, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> The bnxt_re SEND path checks wr->send_flags to enable features such as
> IP checksum offload. However, send_flags is a bitmask and may contain
> multiple flags (e.g. IB_SEND_SIGNALED | IB_SEND_IP_CSUM), while the
> existing code uses a switch() statement that only matches when
> send_flags is exactly IB_SEND_IP_CSUM.
> 
> As a result, checksum offload is not enabled when additional SEND
> flags are present.
> 
> Replace the switch() with a bitmask test:
> 
>     if (wr->send_flags & IB_SEND_IP_CSUM)
> 
> This ensures IP checksum offload is enabled correctly when multiple
> SEND flags are used.
> 
> Fixes: 1ac5a4047975 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Add bnxt_re RoCE driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
> ---
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c | 7 +------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> index f19b55c13d58..ff91511bd338 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> @@ -2919,14 +2919,9 @@ int bnxt_re_post_send(struct ib_qp *ib_qp, const struct ib_send_wr *wr,
>  				wqe.rawqp1.lflags |=
>  					SQ_SEND_RAWETH_QP1_LFLAGS_ROCE_CRC;
>  			}
> -			switch (wr->send_flags) {
> -			case IB_SEND_IP_CSUM:
> +			if (wr->send_flags & IB_SEND_IP_CSUM)
>  				wqe.rawqp1.lflags |=
>  					SQ_SEND_RAWETH_QP1_LFLAGS_IP_CHKSUM;
> -				break;

> -			default:
> -				break;
> -			}
>  			fallthrough;

The combination of "default with break" and "fallthrough" doesn't make
any sense. Are you sure that we should keep "fallthrough"?

Thanks

>  		case IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV:
>  			rc = bnxt_re_build_send_wqe(qp, wr, &wqe);
> -- 
> 2.50.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-21  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19  9:32 [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix IB_SEND_IP_CSUM handling in post_send Alok Tiwari
2025-12-21  9:42 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-12-21 16:03   ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-12-21 15:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2025-12-22  8:04 ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251221094223.GH13030@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
    --cc=alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
    --cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox