From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Cc: somnath.kotur@broadcom.com, sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com,
jgg@ziepe.ca, kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com,
selvin.xavier@broadcom.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix IB_SEND_IP_CSUM handling in post_send
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2025 11:42:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251221094223.GH13030@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219093308.2415620-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 01:32:57AM -0800, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> The bnxt_re SEND path checks wr->send_flags to enable features such as
> IP checksum offload. However, send_flags is a bitmask and may contain
> multiple flags (e.g. IB_SEND_SIGNALED | IB_SEND_IP_CSUM), while the
> existing code uses a switch() statement that only matches when
> send_flags is exactly IB_SEND_IP_CSUM.
>
> As a result, checksum offload is not enabled when additional SEND
> flags are present.
>
> Replace the switch() with a bitmask test:
>
> if (wr->send_flags & IB_SEND_IP_CSUM)
>
> This ensures IP checksum offload is enabled correctly when multiple
> SEND flags are used.
>
> Fixes: 1ac5a4047975 ("RDMA/bnxt_re: Add bnxt_re RoCE driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> index f19b55c13d58..ff91511bd338 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/ib_verbs.c
> @@ -2919,14 +2919,9 @@ int bnxt_re_post_send(struct ib_qp *ib_qp, const struct ib_send_wr *wr,
> wqe.rawqp1.lflags |=
> SQ_SEND_RAWETH_QP1_LFLAGS_ROCE_CRC;
> }
> - switch (wr->send_flags) {
> - case IB_SEND_IP_CSUM:
> + if (wr->send_flags & IB_SEND_IP_CSUM)
> wqe.rawqp1.lflags |=
> SQ_SEND_RAWETH_QP1_LFLAGS_IP_CHKSUM;
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> fallthrough;
The combination of "default with break" and "fallthrough" doesn't make
any sense. Are you sure that we should keep "fallthrough"?
Thanks
> case IB_WR_SEND_WITH_INV:
> rc = bnxt_re_build_send_wqe(qp, wr, &wqe);
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-21 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-19 9:32 [PATCH] RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix IB_SEND_IP_CSUM handling in post_send Alok Tiwari
2025-12-21 9:42 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2025-12-21 16:03 ` ALOK TIWARI
2025-12-21 15:56 ` Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
2025-12-22 8:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251221094223.GH13030@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com \
--cc=alok.a.tiwarilinux@gmail.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=selvin.xavier@broadcom.com \
--cc=somnath.kotur@broadcom.com \
--cc=sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox