From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@ownmail.net>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] RDMA/core: add bio_vec based RDMA read/write API
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 09:57:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260121085727.GD16458@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260121084840.GX13201@unreal>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:48:40AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > +static int rdma_rw_init_map_wrs_bvec(struct rdma_rw_ctx *ctx, struct ib_qp *qp,
> > > + const struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 nr_bvec,
> > > + struct bvec_iter *iter,
> > > + u64 remote_addr, u32 rkey, enum dma_data_direction dir)
>
> Don't you both think these functions take too many arguments? It might be
> worth introducing something like "struct rdma_rw_init_attrs" and passing
> that instead.
Not sure that buys us much. Having a {bvec_table, bvec_iter} tuple
OTOH might be a nice general data structure. Not really for this
series, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-21 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 14:31 [PATCH v2 0/4] Add a bio_vec based API to core/rw.c Chuck Lever
2026-01-20 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] RDMA/core: add bio_vec based RDMA read/write API Chuck Lever
2026-01-21 8:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-21 8:48 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-01-21 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-01-21 10:16 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-01-21 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-21 14:14 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-21 14:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-21 15:10 ` Chuck Lever
2026-01-20 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] RDMA/core: use IOVA-based DMA mapping for bvec RDMA operations Chuck Lever
2026-01-21 8:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-20 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] RDMA/core: add MR support for bvec-based " Chuck Lever
2026-01-21 9:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-01-20 14:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] svcrdma: use bvec-based RDMA read/write API Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260121085727.GD16458@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=dai.ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@ownmail.net \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox