From: Prathamesh Deshpande <prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com>
To: leon@kernel.org
Cc: dledford@redhat.com, haggaie@mellanox.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/mlx5: Fix potential NULL dereference in query_device
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 19:25:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331182615.16983-1-prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331134955.GF814676@unreal>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 04:49:55PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 02:44:27AM +0100, Prathamesh Deshpande wrote:
> > Smatch reported an inconsistent NULL check for 'uhw' in
> > mlx5_ib_query_device(). While 'uhw_outlen' is checked at the end of
> > the function before calling ib_copy_to_udata(), 'uhw' is explicitly
> > checked for NULL earlier in the same function.
> >
> > If a caller provides a non-zero 'uhw_outlen' but a NULL 'uhw' pointer,
> > ib_copy_to_udata() will attempt to dereference 'uhw',
>
> How is it possible?
Hi Leon,
You are right that in the current uverbs paths, 'uhw_outlen' and 'uhw'
should stay in sync.
However, Smatch flags this as an inconsistency because 'uhw' is explicitly
checked for NULL earlier in this same function (at line 968). If the code
assumes 'uhw' could be NULL there, it is safer and more consistent to
check the pointer directly before passing it to ib_copy_to_udata() at
line 1357.
This prevents any future refactoring or unconventional kernel-space
callers from accidentally triggering a NULL dereference.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 1:44 [PATCH] IB/mlx5: Fix potential NULL dereference in query_device Prathamesh Deshpande
2026-03-31 13:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-03-31 18:25 ` Prathamesh Deshpande [this message]
2026-03-31 19:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] <202603311604.GD814676@unreal>
2026-03-31 21:57 ` Prathamesh Deshpande
2026-04-09 9:51 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-04-10 1:07 ` Prathamesh Deshpande
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260331182615.16983-1-prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com \
--to=prathameshdeshpande7@gmail.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=haggaie@mellanox.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox