From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Michael Margolin <mrgolin@amazon.com>
Cc: leon@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, sleybo@amazon.com,
matua@amazon.com, gal.pressman@linux.dev,
Yonatan Nachum <ynachum@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 1/4] RDMA/core: Add Completion Counters support
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2026 13:13:57 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260409161357.GL3357077@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260409160007.GA24340@dev-dsk-mrgolin-1c-b2091117.eu-west-1.amazon.com>
On Thu, Apr 09, 2026 at 04:00:07PM +0000, Michael Margolin wrote:
> EFA actually has a single counter object type that can count all events
> as you suggest here, but I chose to define a single container for
> success and error completion counts in core for three main reasons:
>
> 1. Consistency with userspace - we usually have a 1:1 mapping between
> rdma-core and kernel objects.
Well here we would have two kernel objects right?
> 2. Although the UE spec does not define HW interfaces, it does couple
> success and error counting.
It's just counting, it seem slike the api is you get a counter and
when certain events happen it counts. You get to pick what incrs that
counter.
> 3. A single object for success and error completions gives more freedom
> to device implementations. For instance, it allows optimizing device
> HW resources by implementing the error counter in a less performant
> way.
This can be done anyhow by choosing fast/slow counters based on the
requested bits to count. If userspace requests an error only counter
it can be routed properly.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-09 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-07 11:54 [PATCH for-next 0/4] Introduce Completion Counters Michael Margolin
2026-04-07 11:54 ` [PATCH for-next 1/4] RDMA/core: Add Completion Counters support Michael Margolin
2026-04-07 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-09 16:00 ` Michael Margolin
2026-04-09 16:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-04-09 17:29 ` Sean Hefty
2026-04-09 18:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-09 19:15 ` Sean Hefty
2026-04-09 19:44 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-09 22:23 ` Sean Hefty
2026-04-09 18:36 ` Michael Margolin
2026-04-07 11:54 ` [PATCH for-next 2/4] RDMA/core: Add Completion Counters to resource tracking Michael Margolin
2026-04-07 11:54 ` [PATCH for-next 3/4] RDMA/efa: Update device interface Michael Margolin
2026-04-07 11:54 ` [PATCH for-next 4/4] RDMA/efa: Add Completion Counters support Michael Margolin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260409161357.GL3357077@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=gal.pressman@linux.dev \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matua@amazon.com \
--cc=mrgolin@amazon.com \
--cc=sleybo@amazon.com \
--cc=ynachum@amazon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox