From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Allen Hubbe <allen.hubbe@amd.com>
Cc: Abhijit Gangurde <abhijit.gangurde@amd.com>,
jgg@ziepe.ca, leon@kernel.org, brett.creeley@amd.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, nikhil.agarwal@amd.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: ionic: Add PHC state page for user space access
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 07:52:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260412075214.3e87ace0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69c189b7-9896-41cf-b28f-5ed4c7b80d6a@amd.com>
On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 19:44:18 -0400 Allen Hubbe wrote:
> On 4/10/2026 4:43 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:10:09 -0400 Allen Hubbe wrote:
> >> The simple answer is just following the same approach as an existing
> >> implementation. See struct mlx5_ib_clock_info and
> >> mlx5_update_clock_info_page().
> >>
> >> Making this common might risk presuming that other implementations will
> >> be a similar design. Compare these to the sfc driver. The clock is
> >> quite different from ionic and mlx5, not using timecounter, because
> >> instead of a free-running cycle counter the hardware itself provides an
> >> adjustable clock for timestamping.
> >
> > So your augment is basically that drivers which don't use sw timecounter
> > exist so we shouldn't bother creating common definitions for drivers
> > that do? Why do we have common implementation of timecounter in the
> > kernel at all then?
> >
> > These are rhetorical questions.
>
> There is no suggestion to get rid of timecounter in the kernel.
>
> Maybe I've been overthinking this and misunderstood your first reply.
> Did you mean, just, why not move this to ib_user_verbs.h, struct
> ib_uverbs_phc_state, and use it from the vendor driver?
I think so, just drop the ionic from the names and pop it into a header
that won't be awkward to reuse by other vendors.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-12 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 10:24 [PATCH 0/4] ionic: RDMA completion timestamping support Abhijit Gangurde
2026-04-01 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: ionic: register PHC for rdma timestamping Abhijit Gangurde
2026-04-01 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ionic: Add PHC state page for user space access Abhijit Gangurde
2026-04-02 0:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-10 13:10 ` Allen Hubbe
2026-04-10 20:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-10 23:44 ` Allen Hubbe
2026-04-12 14:52 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-01 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] RDMA/ionic: map PHC state into user space Abhijit Gangurde
2026-04-01 10:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] RDMA/ionic: add completion timestamp to CQE format Abhijit Gangurde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260412075214.3e87ace0@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=abhijit.gangurde@amd.com \
--cc=allen.hubbe@amd.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=brett.creeley@amd.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox