Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Sriharsha Basavapatna <sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/core: remove extraneous dummy helper functions
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 22:36:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519203629.1341667-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

The _ib_copy_validate_udata_in() and _ib_respond_udata() functions
are now defined unconditionally, but there is still a dummy helper
definition for them when CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS is disabled,
leading to a build failure:

drivers/infiniband/core/ib_core_uverbs.c:433:5: error: redefinition of '_ib_copy_validate_udata_in'
  433 | int _ib_copy_validate_udata_in(struct ib_udata *udata, void *req,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/rdma/uverbs_std_types.h:10,
                 from drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs.h:49,
                 from drivers/infiniband/core/ib_core_uverbs.c:10:
include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h:961:19: note: previous definition of '_ib_copy_validate_udata_in' with type 'int(struct ib_udata *, void *, size_t,  size_t)' {aka 'int(struct ib_udata *, void *, long unsigned int,  long unsigned int)'}
  961 | static inline int _ib_copy_validate_udata_in(struct ib_udata *udata, void *req,
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/infiniband/core/ib_core_uverbs.c:483:5: error: redefinition of '_ib_respond_udata'
  483 | int _ib_respond_udata(struct ib_udata *udata, const void *src, size_t len)
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h:968:19: note: previous definition of '_ib_respond_udata' with type 'int(struct ib_udata *, const void *, size_t)' {aka 'int(struct ib_udata *, const void *, long unsigned int)'}
  968 | static inline int _ib_respond_udata(struct ib_udata *udata, const void *src,
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Remove the now incorrect dummy helpers and move the declarations
out of the #ifdef block.

Fixes: 65b044cee9fb ("RDMA/core: Move the _ib_copy_validate_udata* functions to ib_core_uverbs")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h | 20 ++++----------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h b/include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h
index e2af17da3e32..bcca58ee0171 100644
--- a/include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h
+++ b/include/rdma/uverbs_ioctl.h
@@ -856,6 +856,10 @@ ib_uverbs_get_ucontext(const struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
 	return ib_uverbs_get_ucontext_file(attrs->ufile);
 }
 
+int _ib_copy_validate_udata_in(struct ib_udata *udata, void *req,
+			       size_t kernel_size, size_t minimum_size);
+int _ib_respond_udata(struct ib_udata *udata, const void *src, size_t len);
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_ACCESS)
 int uverbs_get_flags64(u64 *to, const struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs_bundle,
 		       size_t idx, u64 allowed_bits);
@@ -898,9 +902,6 @@ int _uverbs_get_const_unsigned(u64 *to,
 int uverbs_copy_to_struct_or_zero(const struct uverbs_attr_bundle *bundle,
 				  size_t idx, const void *from, size_t size);
 
-int _ib_copy_validate_udata_in(struct ib_udata *udata, void *req,
-			       size_t kernel_size, size_t minimum_size);
-int _ib_respond_udata(struct ib_udata *udata, const void *src, size_t len);
 #else
 static inline int
 uverbs_get_flags64(u64 *to, const struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs_bundle,
@@ -957,19 +958,6 @@ _uverbs_get_const_unsigned(u64 *to,
 {
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
-
-static inline int _ib_copy_validate_udata_in(struct ib_udata *udata, void *req,
-					     size_t kernel_size,
-					     size_t minimum_size)
-{
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
-
-static inline int _ib_respond_udata(struct ib_udata *udata, const void *src,
-				    size_t len)
-{
-	return -EINVAL;
-}
 #endif
 
 #define uverbs_get_const_signed(_to, _attrs_bundle, _idx)                      \
-- 
2.39.5


             reply	other threads:[~2026-05-19 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-19 20:36 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2026-05-19 22:52 ` [PATCH] RDMA/core: remove extraneous dummy helper functions Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-20  9:35 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260519203629.1341667-1-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sriharsha.basavapatna@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox