From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC1E4418FF; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 19:37:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780688277; cv=none; b=XWqOpiOWuMbiKnPwvldPco5PVMm7KSkZEGbtvGNnJ8Qz/YJ+8dIlBzpbAVBv8UZ2+IZK6EhHot6oElrVo46JZLuYG/7uQXO7ra2eLCHVVC0o4waG2xaqpjL4oX+kuu1vczGf/3OBheyRSV8saUrSGdjQ7xyHRTih5reBx/QspII= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780688277; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eBW079d2xQiXO+JShVeZcVB0hgdx4zjyQSCR20yGVoQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=gRWGzppxj/pohzi0gf+A6ZImkHc83EjdPrMUgrak9QQ7q2T6xLFcPvIXB81GZK7LgRlmlCTa1ECI8jzowcsEpT3fWeGpOmD/zXA5lZwxCm3dNXtWj1QC8UX+UR9vHmRqX21w26eUQa8Jxoesn4Bozt0QHnQ7HauHX2pIU+kpMcQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ctaS8MkM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ctaS8MkM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40CAD1F00893; Fri, 5 Jun 2026 19:37:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780688276; bh=/a7G7f25H4cU1CNJKSOc5D3i5C8CEpdGKn/zi7RTUoY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ctaS8MkMgpfBt0k5G6nPd/VnKQB7A3lEId/1+XWMoV0i7qFcBNRIoSNroKdKKteTp g5bl0Bs5Zilk5Dce7yiYDKLyObqW4C7KbMZsJuKF/V+z7BExoUiIHil/9pH6o3oZEO TIbR8e96yyI7QYDs0gA5a3Hx/WdbJqoCtMALJKDaO4Deoz4/kR+19Im+yBKF0QwgCc BLbuGNwkzm/YbtK9ONk6SOF/0Q7j1ONdWTcyLA/dVP7ktSumwPdQzAwWThthA1ZjqG QnbODrqiW0sLHiC+yS82/PbAcMDcVjktt+nwSWpHqcMmUGDlSlB+/IpVx73woHtirj 6MA41hakqiBdg== From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Sasha Levin , Vladislav Nikolaev , Zhu Yanjun , Doug Ledford , Jason Gunthorpe , Haggai Eran , Kamal Heib , Amir Vadai , Moni Shoua , Yonatan Cohen , Leon Romanovsky , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhu Yanjun , lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, syzbot+cfcc1a3c85be15a40cba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Zhu Yanjun Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task" Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 15:37:28 -0400 Message-ID: <20260605-stable-reply-0021@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 In-Reply-To: <20260603121902.274-1-vlad102nikolaev@gmail.com> References: <20260603121902.274-1-vlad102nikolaev@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > [PATCH v2 5.10/5.15] RDMA/rxe: Fix the error "trying to register non-static key in rxe_cleanup_task" I'm dropping this for now; it isn't right for either branch as submitted: - 5.15.y: the bug doesn't exist there -- the task locks are already spin_lock_init()'d on the QP-create error path. - 5.10.y: mis-targeted -- it patches rxe_qp_do_cleanup(), but the 5.10 error-unwind path doesn't call rxe_cleanup_task() there. -- Thanks, Sasha