From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Chenguang Zhao <chenguang.zhao@linux.dev>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com,
shayd@nvidia.com, moshe@nvidia.com,
Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v3] RDMA/mlx5: quiesce CQ polling before device shutdown on reboot
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:50:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716105008.GD357857@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2c5dda9-3228-44a3-a4c9-89e8cc4501bc@linux.dev>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 05:03:37PM +0800, Chenguang Zhao wrote:
> Hi, Leon
> reboot -f skips orderly shutdown and goes directly to:
>
> kernel_restart_prepare() -> device_shutdown() -> mlx5 shutdown
> Upper layers may still hold live CQs, while ib-comp-wq keeps
> polling — a use-after-free race.
The point is that this flow is neither RDMA- nor mlx5-specific, and it
works as expected. mlx5 shutdown() stops the FW/HW, while the kernel
stops and tears down the running threads.
>
> Normal reboot usually works because userspace has already
> torn down RDMA and called ib_free_cq().
There is no difference, from the kernel's perspective, between a
normal and a forced reboot, except that the former bypasses
userspace shutdown.
Thanks
>
> Thanks
>
> 在 2026/7/16 16:42, Leon Romanovsky 写道:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 04:23:07PM +0800, Chenguang Zhao wrote:
> >> From: Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
> >>
> >> On reboot -f with NFS over RDMA, mlx5 shutdown can tear the device
> >> down while ib-comp-wq still polls live CQs, leading to UAF in
> >> wr_cqe->done().
> >>
> >> Mark the device shutting down before teardown, flush completion
> >> workqueues so in-flight pollers observe the flag, skip SYS_ERROR
> >> completion delivery, and make poll/arm CQ a no-op under the CQ lock
> >> while shutting down.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chenguang Zhao <zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn>
> >> ---
> >> changelog:
> >> - Fix the race on MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_SHUTTING_DOWN: set the
> >> flag, then flush ib-comp / mlx5_ib event workqueues via an
> >> mlx5_ib quiesce hook before fast_unload/teardown.
> >> - Check shutting-down under cq->lock in mlx5_ib_poll_cq/arm_cq.
> >> - Export ib_comp_wq and ib_comp_unbound_wq so modular mlx5_ib
> >> can flush them.
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260714075558.1420384-1-chenguang.zhao@linux.dev/
> >>
> >> v1:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260702073422.279820-1-chenguang.zhao@linux.dev/
> >>
> >> drivers/infiniband/core/device.c | 2 ++
> >> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c | 11 ++++++++++
> >> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/health.c | 3 +++
> >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/main.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> .../mellanox/mlx5/core/sf/dev/driver.c | 3 +++
> >> include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 11 ++++++++++
> >> 7 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
> > <...>
> >
> >> +static void mlx5_ib_shutdown_quiesce(void)
> >> +{
> >> + flush_workqueue(ib_comp_wq);
> >> + flush_workqueue(ib_comp_unbound_wq);
> >> + flush_workqueue(mlx5_ib_event_wq);
> >> +}
> > These workqueues are shared by all IB drivers and the core. Drivers
> > must not flush or destroy them.
> >
> > Why this is not FW issue?
> >
> > Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-15 8:23 [PATCH rdma-next v3] RDMA/mlx5: quiesce CQ polling before device shutdown on reboot Chenguang Zhao
2026-07-16 8:42 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-07-16 9:03 ` Chenguang Zhao
2026-07-16 10:50 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716105008.GD357857@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=chenguang.zhao@linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhaochenguang@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox