From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/rds: restrict the rdma_cm ids to IB devices
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 07:41:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918074120.1D5901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917074108.174262-1-achender@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] rds: memory leak of rdma_cm_id in rds_ib_conn_path_connect error path
--
commit 09995cfa814e39bb6b39d83f2fc5b812b28b6fcc
Author: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
net/rds: restrict the rdma_cm ids to IB devices
This commit restricts the RDS RDMA connection IDs to IB devices by utilizing
the rdma_restrict_node_type API. It adds calls to this function during
listener initialization, probe check, and connection path setup to ensure
the CMA IDs are strictly bound to RDMA_NODE_IB_CA nodes.
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> index 4feb0edc360c8..a859c252fd9a7 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -999,6 +999,16 @@ int rds_ib_conn_path_connect(struct rds_conn_path *cp)
> goto out;
> }
>
> + /* rds_ib_laddr_check() only vouched for the local address being
> + * on an IB device; the address resolution below picks the device
> + * on its own, so restrict it to the same kind.
> + */
> + ret = rdma_restrict_node_type(ic->i_cm_id, RDMA_NODE_IB_CA);
> + if (ret) {
> + rdsdebug("rdma_restrict_node_type() failed: %d\n", ret);
> + goto out;
[Severity: Low]
Does this error path leak the rdma_cm_id resource?
When rdma_restrict_node_type() fails here, the code jumps to the 'out'
label and returns without destroying the newly allocated ic->i_cm_id. By
contrast, if the subsequent rdma_resolve_addr() call fails, the code
explicitly cleans up with rdma_destroy_id(ic->i_cm_id) and sets it to NULL
before returning.
While rdma_restrict_node_type() currently deterministically returns 0 for a
newly allocated ID (since it is in the RDMA_CM_IDLE state and using a valid
node type), should this error path also clean up the ID to prevent future
resource leaks if the restriction logic changes?
> + }
> +
> rdsdebug("created cm id %p for conn %p\n", ic->i_cm_id, conn);
>
> if (ipv6_addr_v4mapped(&conn->c_faddr)) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917074108.174262-1-achender@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 7:41 [PATCH net-next] net/rds: restrict the rdma_cm ids to IB devices Allison Henderson
2026-09-18 7:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-21 8:37 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260918074120.1D5901F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox