From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hui Peng" <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/rds: fix incoming message refcount leak and header bounds check in rds_recv.c
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 22:34:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260920223437.D12F51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919223429.3882046-1-benquike@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] net/rds: commit message claims refcount fix but patch modifies latency trace
--
commit 80f53e33ea420eaf26746196c2c667ca4d80ade2
Author: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
net/rds: fix incoming message refcount leak and header bounds check in rds_recv.c
This commit modifies rds_cmsg_recv() to add a zero-check for latency trace
calculations.
> net/rds: fix incoming message refcount leak and header bounds check in rds_recv.c
>
> In net/rds/recv.c, ensure incoming RDS message references (rds_inc_put)
> and socket receive queue bounds are properly balanced when handling
> error or truncated incoming frames.
[Severity: Medium]
Does the commit message accurately describe the included changes?
The message explicitly claims to fix a refcount leak involving rds_inc_put
and a receive queue bounds imbalance. However, the actual code changes only
add a zero-check to diagnostic latency trace calculations:
net/rds/recv.c:rds_cmsg_recv() {
...
if (inc->i_rx_lat_trace[j + 1] &&
inc->i_rx_lat_trace[j])
t.rx_trace[i] = inc->i_rx_lat_trace[j + 1] -
inc->i_rx_lat_trace[j];
...
}
Are the refcount and receive queue bounds fixes missing from this patch?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919223429.3882046-1-benquike@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-20 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 22:34 [PATCH] net/rds: fix incoming message refcount leak and header bounds check in rds_recv.c Hui Peng
2026-09-20 22:34 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-20 23:19 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 6:46 ` Allison Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260920223437.D12F51F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=benquike@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox