From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/12] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:54:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923085429.9BA3A1F0089D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260922085410.391323-12-achender@kernel.org>
> The previous patch gave each transport its own connection count in
> t_conn_count, incremented and decremented at exactly the points where
> the global rds_conn_count is. That leaves rds_conn_count with a
> single remaining consumer: the seed of the per-path workqueue names
> in __rds_conn_create().
>
> Switch the name seed to t_conn_count, as UEK does, and remove
> rds_conn_count. The numbering becomes per-transport instead of
> global, so connections of different transports can now receive the
> same seed; workqueue names carry no uniqueness requirement, and the
> seed was already reused as the count rose and fell. Removing the
> counter also removes the rds_conn_lock round-trip that
> rds_conn_destroy_fini() took solely to decrement it. (The free path
> still sleeps in destroy_workqueue(), so the last reference has to be
> dropped from process context as before; only that one lock goes.)
>
> Based on the Oracle UEK commit "net/rds: Each RDS transport
> should keep its own connection count".
>
> Assisted-by: Claude-Code:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260922085410.391323-1-achender@kernel.org?part=11
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 8:53 [PATCH net-next v6 00/12] net/rds: make connection lifetime reference-counted Allison Henderson
2026-09-22 8:53 ` [PATCH net-next v6 01/12] net/rds: ib: don't enable interrupts in rds_ib_conn_free() Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 02/12] net/rds: undo conn_alloc() the same way on every __rds_conn_create() exit Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 03/12] net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with rds_destroy_pending() Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 04/12] net/rds: make rds_destroy_pending() report a connection's own destroy Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 05/12] net/rds: split connection destroy into quiesce and kref-governed free Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 06/12] net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport unload Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 07/12] net/rds: unlink transport nodes before a possibly deferred connection free Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 08/12] net/rds: hold connection references in lookup, sockets and c_passive Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 09/12] net/rds: take cp_lock to purge cp_send_queue in the quiesce Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 10/12] net/rds: pin the connection across RDMA-CM event handling Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-26 9:48 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 11/12] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-22 8:54 ` [PATCH net-next v6 12/12] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming Allison Henderson
2026-09-23 8:54 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923085429.9BA3A1F0089D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox