From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF8D374E5B for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790411342; cv=none; b=GOv3HXzlRNPQ5sokLYQcPunOAg96zCsOTlZRwJSBUxc1+/9iKpPzB0DU/MHNGB6c/1GiUyhVDxY25VHQne4MHK6i2772d4zUoMm62+BTKQvESdsFjLKdpZy9iB6lpaeCV6JT7JuwPQeqzU74LJA5a/uOoM8tRen9yLwvy208mp8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790411342; c=relaxed/simple; bh=v9VoSSz2IcPgIB1S5v7zi6AEqJrgjGu4lFsgiHcknMk=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=SrhVzvq2nJWqexhO2T8bajKgD+em5KKxUYAwfz9Mddx7oZFq0NubxIOa1kDRTrKSfTjWZb3kD70zwoVSGLlVPkdgjfbhk5ogi1z4FV7SjQMsfy61JN+utDC0v2KbaQ7tRG9Pk/8tUs/xokJ1U+tygqmDWNpf2ptn5uzFekyLA+g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=X5+zK2i6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="X5+zK2i6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB3B21F000FF; Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:29:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790411341; bh=v9VoSSz2IcPgIB1S5v7zi6AEqJrgjGu4lFsgiHcknMk=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=X5+zK2i6eeG6Le6nXKs4yAFj6x1BXISWgLapXUcEARjLZwNfCChYWz4KVjJVUC2rr gdB9KnScDc22Gy8dySn2wAEw89IOGVm+Nw4Moi3YMG+GJkhnPhzE0LR2MF91Ebd9uZ 9Sn/C+yp7KALV8ZoFeSqEfiecAEnIow7bi313yT2pJg+WgX922QKtW1wEyr4g8bB23 kpltlVu+3pxWVHzeNLGovUIJQ/bkgMidiZS0vaOl7Yq+r5h8eM8hK3yucw1uRT/2Gm q3tn2MAp7fK1Pob1K0pKqPO8UFwFy/GwoWgewlFyM1asete3MqWowk4n6piU71FOPu l8nJJjmjQdgMA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [for-next v3 3/5] RDMA/ionic: segregate rq related fields from ionic_qp into a new ionic_rq struct Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Abhijit Gangurde" Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260925082802.2675902-4-abhijit.gangurde@amd.com> References: <20260925082802.2675902-1-abhijit.gangurde@amd.com> <20260925082802.2675902-4-abhijit.gangurde@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2026 08:29:00 +0000 Message-Id: <20260926082900.CB3B21F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: Amit Kumar >=20 > In preparation for SRQ support, segregate rq related fields from ionic_qp > into a new ionic_rq struct. This refactoring enables both non-SRQ and > future SRQ code to leverage the common rq init/destroy infrastructure > around ionic_qp_rq_init/_destroy with no functional changes. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar > Signed-off-by: Abhijit Gangurde Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260925082802.2675= 902-1-abhijit.gangurde@amd.com?part=3D3