From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Youngsung Ahn" <ays511.kr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: validate inline sge_offset in finish_packet() before indexing inline_data[]
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:41:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930184103.32EF51F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930182216.2510953-1-ays511.kr@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] rdma/rxe: TOCTOU bypass of sge_offset bounds check in finish_packet()
--
commit cb139c29341b6f7fcb85c3b737c416392d13b68f
Author: Youngsung Ahn <ays511.kr@gmail.com>
Subject: RDMA/rxe: validate inline sge_offset in finish_packet() before indexing inline_data[]
This commit aims to fix an out-of-bounds read by bounding sge_offset against
qp->sq.max_inline before copying inline data from the mmap'd send queue.
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
> index 53f7c1e7fe55b..887bceed6b5d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c
> @@ -510,7 +510,14 @@ static int finish_packet(struct rxe_qp *qp, struct rxe_av *av,
>
> if (pkt->mask & RXE_WRITE_OR_SEND_MASK) {
> if (wqe->wr.send_flags & IB_SEND_INLINE) {
> - u8 *tmp = &wqe->dma.inline_data[wqe->dma.sge_offset];
> + u8 *tmp;
> +
> + if (unlikely(wqe->dma.sge_offset > (u32)qp->sq.max_inline ||
> + payload > (u32)qp->sq.max_inline -
> + wqe->dma.sge_offset))
> + return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
Since the send queue is mapped into user space, can a concurrent modification
to wqe->dma.sge_offset bypass this check?
It looks like the value is read multiple times directly from shared memory.
Could an attacker swap a valid offset with an invalid one immediately after
the bounds check succeeds?
> +
> + tmp = &wqe->dma.inline_data[wqe->dma.sge_offset];
[Severity: High]
Does this setup an out-of-bounds pointer for the subsequent memcpy if
wqe->dma.sge_offset is modified after the validation above?
Would caching wqe->dma.sge_offset in a local variable via READ_ONCE()
prevent this race?
>
> memcpy(payload_addr(pkt), tmp, payload);
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260930182216.2510953-1-ays511.kr@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-30 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-30 18:22 [PATCH] RDMA/rxe: validate inline sge_offset in finish_packet() before indexing inline_data[] Youngsung Ahn
2026-09-30 18:41 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01 15:24 ` [PATCH v2] " Youngsung Ahn
2026-10-01 15:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-01 16:15 ` Leon Romanovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-30 15:17 [PATCH] " AYS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260930184103.32EF51F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ays511.kr@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox