Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Allison Henderson" <achender@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 03/13] net/rds: ib: refuse to attach a connection to a device being removed
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 17:56:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261003175630.231121F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261003163215.250253-4-achender@kernel.org>

> rds_ib_remove_one() drops every connection on the device's conn_list
> in rds_ib_dev_shutdown(), then clears the client data so that no new
> connect can find the device.  A connect that is already past
> rds_ib_get_client_data() when the walk runs is not covered by either:
> rds_ib_setup_qp() goes on to rds_ib_add_conn(), which moves the
> connection onto the conn_list the walk has just finished with, and
> builds a QP on a device that is on its way out.  Nothing drops that
> connection afterwards - the device's shutdown walk is over, and the
> connection never returns to ib_nodev_conns, which is the only list the
> transport exit sweeps - so it outlives the device, and the module.
> 
> Make rds_ib_dev_shutdown() mark the device as shutting down under
> rds_ibdev->spinlock before it walks conn_list, and have
> rds_ib_add_conn() refuse, under the same lock, to attach a connection
> to a device so marked.  Every connection is then either on the list
> when the walk drops it, or refused: the connect fails, the connection
> stays on ib_nodev_conns, and either its own drop or the exit sweep
> tears it down.  rds_ib_setup_qp() has not taken anything from the
> device at that point, so the failure needs no unwinding beyond the
> client-data reference it already releases.
> 
> This mirrors the UEK gate on the device removal flag in
> rds_ib_add_conn().
> 
> Fixes: fc19de38be92 ("RDS/IB: disconnect when IB devices are removed")
> Assisted-by: Claude-Code:claude-fable-5
> Signed-off-by: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261003163215.250253-1-achender@kernel.org?part=3


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-03 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-03 16:32 [PATCH net-next v8 00/13] net/rds: make connection lifetime reference-counted Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 01/13] net/rds: ib: don't enable interrupts in rds_ib_conn_free() Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 02/13] net/rds: undo conn_alloc() the same way on every __rds_conn_create() exit Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 03/13] net/rds: ib: refuse to attach a connection to a device being removed Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-04 16:34   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 04/13] net/rds: guard every work-requeueing site with rds_destroy_pending() Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:34   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 05/13] net/rds: make rds_destroy_pending() report a connection's own destroy Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 06/13] net/rds: split connection destroy into quiesce and kref-governed free Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 07/13] net/rds: unlink transport nodes before a possibly deferred connection free Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:35   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 08/13] net/rds: wait for connections to be freed on transport unload Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:35   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 09/13] net/rds: hold a connection reference from struct rds_incoming Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:35   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 10/13] net/rds: take cp_lock to purge cp_send_queue in the quiesce Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 11/13] net/rds: hold connection references in lookup, sockets and c_passive Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:35   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 12/13] net/rds: pin the connection across RDMA-CM event handling Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-04 16:35   ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-03 16:32 ` [PATCH net-next v8 13/13] net/rds: drop rds_conn_count in favor of t_conn_count Allison Henderson
2026-10-03 17:56   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261003175630.231121F0089B@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=achender@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox