From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>
Cc: jgg@ziepe.ca, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
tangchengchang@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next] RDMA/hns: Add reset fence before freeing DMA memory when destroy mbox fails
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 15:31:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261115133104.GB42525@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110115609.1981900-1-huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 07:56:09PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
> When a destroy mailbox (QPC/CQC/MPT/SRQC/EQC) fails or is skipped
> in a reset, HW may still access the context while the driver frees
> its DMA memory, causing a HW UAF.
>
> According to the suggestion in [1], add a reset fence before freeing
> DMA memory when the destroy mailbox fails. Once ops->ae_dev_reset_cnt()
> increases, the HW reset is guaranteed to have completed, so HW will
> no longer access the DMA memory and it is safe for the driver
> to free it.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20250401133956.GC186258@ziepe.ca/
>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c | 7 +++-
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 1 +
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c
> index 1943031b0dbe..885900e68779 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c
> @@ -287,5 +287,10 @@ int hns_roce_create_hw_ctx(struct hns_roce_dev *dev,
>
> int hns_roce_destroy_hw_ctx(struct hns_roce_dev *dev, u8 cmd, unsigned long idx)
> {
> - return hns_roce_cmd_mbox(dev, 0, 0, cmd, idx);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = hns_roce_cmd_mbox(dev, 0, 0, cmd, idx);
> + dev->hw->mbox_rst_fence(dev, ret);
There is no need to pass ret to .mbox_rst_fence(), call it conditionally
instead:
if (ret)
dev->hw->mbox_rst_fence(dev);
> +
> + return ret;
Is the returned error still relevant after calling `mbox_rst_fence()`?
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> index 5890ee69247c..021a52bc49ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
> @@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ struct hns_roce_hw {
> enum hns_roce_scc_algo algo);
> int (*query_scc_param)(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> enum hns_roce_scc_algo alog);
> + void (*mbox_rst_fence)(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, int mbox_ret);
> };
>
> #define HNS_ROCE_SCC_PARAM_SIZE 4
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> index a8f319a57f25..e17569a532e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c
> @@ -1317,6 +1317,43 @@ static bool check_device_is_in_reset(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static void hns_roce_v2_mbox_rst_fence(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> + int mbox_ret)
> +{
> +#define FENCE_POLL_INTERVAL_US 1000
> +#define FENCE_TIMEOUT_US (60 * 1000 * 1000)
Please put these defines above hns_roce_v2_mbox_rst_fence().
> + struct hns_roce_v2_priv *priv = hr_dev->priv;
> + struct hnae3_handle *handle = priv->handle;
> + const struct hnae3_ae_ops *ops = handle->ae_algo->ops;
> + unsigned long cnt;
> + unsigned long val;
> + int ret;
> +
> + might_sleep();
> +
> + if (!mbox_ret && !check_device_is_in_reset(hr_dev))
> + return;
> +
> + cnt = ops->ae_dev_reset_cnt(handle);
> + if (cnt != hr_dev->reset_cnt)
This is exactly what your check_device_is_in_reset() checks.
> + return;
> +
> + if (!check_device_is_in_reset(hr_dev)) {
> + struct hnae3_ae_dev *ae_dev = pci_get_drvdata(hr_dev->pci_dev);
> + enum hnae3_reset_type rst_type = hr_dev->is_vf ?
> + HNAE3_VF_FUNC_RESET : HNAE3_FUNC_RESET;
> +
> + ops->set_default_reset_request(ae_dev, rst_type);
> + ops->reset_event(hr_dev->pci_dev, handle);
> + }
> +
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(ops->ae_dev_reset_cnt, val, val > cnt,
> + FENCE_POLL_INTERVAL_US, FENCE_TIMEOUT_US,
> + false, handle);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(hr_dev->dev, "reset fence timeout.\n");
> +}
> +
> static bool v2_chk_mbox_is_avail(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, bool *busy)
> {
> struct hns_roce_v2_priv *priv = hr_dev->priv;
> @@ -5943,6 +5980,8 @@ static int hns_roce_v2_destroy_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
> ibdev_err_ratelimited(ibdev,
> "failed to modify QP to RST, ret = %d.\n",
> ret);
> +
> + hr_dev->hw->mbox_rst_fence(hr_dev, ret);
> }
>
> send_cq = hr_qp->ibqp.send_cq ? to_hr_cq(hr_qp->ibqp.send_cq) : NULL;
> @@ -7327,6 +7366,7 @@ static const struct hns_roce_hw hns_roce_hw_v2 = {
> .hns_roce_dev_srq_ops = &hns_roce_v2_dev_srq_ops,
> .config_scc_param = hns_roce_v2_config_scc_param,
> .query_scc_param = hns_roce_v2_query_scc_param,
> + .mbox_rst_fence = hns_roce_v2_mbox_rst_fence,
I don't see much justification for implementing this as a callback when only one
v2 HNS device is supported.
Thanks
> };
>
> static const struct pci_device_id hns_roce_hw_v2_pci_tbl[] = {
> --
> 2.33.0
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-15 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 11:56 [PATCH for-next] RDMA/hns: Add reset fence before freeing DMA memory when destroy mbox fails Junxian Huang
2026-11-10 12:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-15 13:31 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261115133104.GB42525@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=huangjunxian6@hisilicon.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=tangchengchang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox