From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V4 09/14] net/mlx5: Introduce shared devlink instance for PFs on same chip
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 15:08:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2df5ac80-5db6-4b8f-ab5b-b8b89237777f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1764101173-1312171-10-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com>
On 25/11/2025 21:06, Tariq Toukan wrote:
> +
> +static void mlx5_shd_destroy(struct mlx5_shd *shd)
> +{
> + list_del(&shd->list);
> + kfree(shd->sn);
> + faux_device_destroy(shd->faux_dev);
> +}
> +
> +int mlx5_shd_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> +{
> + u8 *vpd_data __free(kfree) = NULL;
This is undesired syntax explicitly documented as one to avoid. Please
don't use cleanup.h if you do not intend to follow it.
Plus netdev dislikes cleanup, that's another point.
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev->pdev;
> + unsigned int vpd_size, kw_len;
> + struct mlx5_shd *shd;
> + const char *sn;
> + char *end;
> + int start;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!mlx5_core_is_pf(dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + vpd_data = pci_vpd_alloc(pdev, &vpd_size);
Here....
> + if (IS_ERR(vpd_data)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(vpd_data);
> + return err == -ENODEV ? 0 : err;
And here you kfree(IS_ERR).
This is either buggy code or very confusing. Please do not use cleanup.h
if to intend not to read it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-29 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 20:05 [PATCH net-next V4 00/14] devlink and mlx5: Support cross-function rate scheduling Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 01/14] devlink: Reverse locking order for nested instances Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 02/14] documentation: networking: add shared devlink documentation Tariq Toukan
2025-11-28 4:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-28 11:00 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-11-29 3:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-01 10:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-12-01 21:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-02 7:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-12-02 18:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-03 10:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-12-04 18:57 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-12-05 9:39 ` Jiri Pirko
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 03/14] devlink: Add helpers to lock nested-in instances Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 04/14] devlink: Refactor devlink_rate_nodes_check Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 05/14] devlink: Decouple rate storage from associated devlink object Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 06/14] devlink: Add parent dev to devlink API Tariq Toukan
2025-11-27 15:28 ` Simon Horman
2025-11-27 19:18 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 07/14] devlink: Allow parent dev for rate-set and rate-new Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 08/14] devlink: Allow rate node parents from other devlinks Tariq Toukan
2025-11-28 4:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-28 9:57 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 09/14] net/mlx5: Introduce shared devlink instance for PFs on same chip Tariq Toukan
2025-11-29 14:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 10/14] net/mlx5: Expose a function to clear a vport's parent Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 11/14] net/mlx5: Store QoS sched nodes in the sh_devlink Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 12/14] net/mlx5: qos: Support cross-device tx scheduling Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 13/14] net/mlx5: qos: Enable cross-device scheduling Tariq Toukan
2025-11-25 20:06 ` [PATCH net-next V4 14/14] net/mlx5: Document devlink rates Tariq Toukan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2df5ac80-5db6-4b8f-ab5b-b8b89237777f@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox