From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Binoy Jayan <binoy.jayan@linaro.org>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:21:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHv-k__yWEaBhNYqvdjZPFpVtMKGMC75_eMh7Y4V_=MNhtzMbw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:29:45 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> On 25 October 2016 at 17:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, October 25, 2016 5:31:57 PM CEST Binoy Jayan wrote:
> >> static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >> u64 out_param, unsigned long in_modifier,
> >> @@ -198,11 +218,12 @@ static int __hns_roce_cmd_mbox_wait(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u64 in_param,
> >> struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd = &hr_dev->cmd;
> >> struct device *dev = &hr_dev->pdev->dev;
> >> struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;
> >> - int ret = 0;
> >> + int orig_free_head, ret = 0;
> >> +
> >> + wait_event(cmd->wq, (orig_free_head = atomic_free_node(cmd, -1)) != -1);
> >>
> >> spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >> - WARN_ON(cmd->free_head < 0);
> >> - context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];
> >> + context = &cmd->context[orig_free_head];
> >> context->token += cmd->token_mask + 1;
> >> cmd->free_head = context->next;
> >> spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);
> >>
> >
> > You get the lock in atomic_free_node() and then again right after that.
> > Why not combine the two and only take the lock inside of that
> > function that returns a context?
>
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> I couldn't figure out a way to wait for a node to be free followed by
> acquiring a lock
> in an atomic fashion. If the lock is acquired after the wait_event,
> there could be race
> between the wait_event and acquiring the lock. If the lock is acquired
> before the
> wait_event, the process may goto sleep with the lock held which is not desired.
> Could you suggest me of some way to circumvent this?
Something like
static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_try_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context = NULL;
spin_lock(&cmd->context_lock);
if (cmd->free_head < 0)
goto out;
context = &cmd->context[cmd->free_head];
... /* update free_head */
out:
spin_unlock(&cmd->context_lock);
return context;
}
...
static struct hns_roce_cmd_context *hns_roce_get_context(struct hns_roce_cmdq *cmd)
{
struct hns_roce_cmd_context *context;
wait_event(cmd->wq, (context = hns_roce_try_get_context(cmd)));
return context;
}
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-25 12:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] infiniband: Remove semaphores Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] IB/hns: Replace semaphore poll_sem with mutex Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] IB/mthca: " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] IB/isert: Replace semaphore sem with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] IB/hns: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <1477396919-27669-7-git-send-email-binoy.jayan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 12:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:59 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 13:21 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-10-25 13:35 ` Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <1477396919-27669-1-git-send-email-binoy.jayan-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] IB/core: iwpm_nlmsg_request: Replace semaphore with completion Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] IB/core: Replace semaphore sm_sem " Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:43 ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:08 ` Binoy Jayan
[not found] ` <CAHv-k_86z3MTYePPQcs5fWSqFeoGxt7UYG_b-SyZGQ7zVW-hSw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 15:48 ` Jack Wang
2016-10-25 15:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
[not found] ` <20161025154822.GA27240-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-25 20:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] IB/mthca: Replace counting semaphore event_sem with wait_event Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] IB/mlx5: Add helper mlx5_ib_post_send_wait Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-10-25 12:46 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-25 12:26 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-25 13:16 ` Binoy Jayan
2016-10-27 6:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-10-27 6:23 ` Binoy Jayan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3400101.E3rphEBHnx@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=binoy.jayan@linaro.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=hal.rosenstock@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox