From: liweihang <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: "dledford@redhat.com" <dledford@redhat.com>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 for-next 0/7] RDMA/core: Correct some coding-style issues
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 02:37:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38fd2d20d1634305818ba2d4786b05b0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210412175937.GA1145318@nvidia.com
On 2021/4/13 2:00, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 04:15:46PM +0800, Weihang Li wrote:
>> Do some cleanups according to the coding-style of kernel.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Remove a BUG_ON in #3 and put the changes into a new patch.
>> - Drop the parts about spaces around xx_for_each_xx() from #4 because some
>> clang formatter prefer current style.
>> - Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/1617697184-48683-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com/
>
> Let's not make a habit of sending patches like this, but I will take
> this one
>
Sure.
>> Wenpeng Liang (6):
>> RDMA/core: Print the function name by __func__ instead of an fixed
>> string
>> RDMA/core: Remove the redundant return statements
>> RDMA/core: Add necessary spaces
>> RDMA/core: Remove redundant spaces
>
> I fixed the layout of most of the lines this patch touched as they
> were still not close enough to the canonical format.
>
OK, thank you.
Weihang
> Applied to for-next, thanks
>
> Jason
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-07 8:15 [PATCH v2 for-next 0/7] RDMA/core: Correct some coding-style issues Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 1/7] RDMA/core: Print the function name by __func__ instead of an fixed string Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 2/7] RDMA/core: Remove the redundant return statements Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 3/7] RDMA/core: Add necessary spaces Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 4/7] RDMA/core: Remove redundant spaces Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 5/7] RDMA/core: Correct format of braces Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 6/7] RDMA/core: Correct format of block comments Weihang Li
2021-04-07 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 7/7] RDMA/core: Remove redundant BUG_ON Weihang Li
2021-04-12 17:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-13 3:46 ` liweihang
2021-04-07 12:26 ` [PATCH v2 for-next 0/7] RDMA/core: Correct some coding-style issues Leon Romanovsky
2021-04-12 17:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-04-13 2:37 ` liweihang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38fd2d20d1634305818ba2d4786b05b0@huawei.com \
--to=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox