From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Roland Dreier <roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Any progress on horrible IPoIB perf with kernel 4.5+?
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:25:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447685d8-1380-2a57-dc83-88b3871fee3f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1RGDXC7JsBN_DS_iqiywKP3GikgAgXm3OK-cZ02tmVctQJQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1402 bytes --]
On 7/6/2016 1:09 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111921 describes a
> performance regression introduced by commit 9207f9d45b0a ("net:
> preserve IP control block during GSO segmentation"). I've recently
> run into this when updating my system, since that commit hit stable
> kernel 4.4.y — in my case I noticed because scp over an IPoIB link
> went from ~200 MB/sec down to below 1 MB/sec. I confirmed that
> reverting that change did fix my performance.
>
> Obviously just reverting that commit isn't the right answer, since I
> believe the patch description that says the commit fixes a crash.
> However before I start working on this myself, I want to make sure I'm
> not duplicating anyone else's work. Doug, you mentioned having time
> to work on it back in May — did you figure anything out? Or is anyone
> else investigating this?
>
> Thanks,
> Roland
>
I *just* came back from PTO. I'm still working through my email (where
I saw your writeup of this issue). I didn't get very far with the issue
back in May, but that's because I didn't have a lot of the background
information you supplied in the other thread and didn't have the time to
dig it out on my own. I could probably make some progress now.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG Key ID: 0E572FDD
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 17:09 Any progress on horrible IPoIB perf with kernel 4.5+? Roland Dreier
[not found] ` <CAL1RGDXC7JsBN_DS_iqiywKP3GikgAgXm3OK-cZ02tmVctQJQA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-06 17:46 ` Yuval Shaia
2016-07-12 14:25 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447685d8-1380-2a57-dc83-88b3871fee3f@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=koct9i-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=roland-BHEL68pLQRGGvPXPguhicg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox