Re: [PATCH v3 for-rc 0/2] Fix sge_num bug

["xuhaoyue (A)" <xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com>]

Hi Jason and Leon,

Actually, I have another bugfix patch set needed to send, and I am waiting for this patch to apply. That one is not related to this patch set.
Could I send it out, since it is a little late for Linux 6.1?
Also, I wonder is that ok to send more than one patch set in the review list.

Sincerely,
haoyue(Aaron)

On 2022/11/10 2:07:35, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:38:45PM +0800, Haoyue Xu wrote:
>> The patchset mainly fixes the sge_num bug relates to sq_inline.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> 1. Move the refactor rq_inline and new CQE inline patches to go 
>> into for-next after this bugfix apply.
>> 2. Change the commit message to better explain the bug.
>> V2 Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/cover/20221026095054.2384620-1-xuhaoyue1@hisilicon.com/
>>
>> Luoyouming (2):
>>   RDMA/hns: Fix ext_sge num error when post send
>>   RDMA/hns: Fix the problem of sge nums
>>
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h |   3 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c  |   3 +-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c   |  18 +++-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c     | 107 ++++++++++++++++----
>>  include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h                 |  15 +++
> 
> Jason,
> 
> I think that it was you who asked to send it to -rc. Given the amount of
> changes together with UAPI in second patch, are you sure that it is -rc4
> material?
> 
> Thanks
> 
>>  5 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.30.0
>>
> .
>