* [PATCH 1/2] opensm: connect roots in fat-tree - implementation
@ 2009-10-22 9:53 Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4AE02BB5.5060600-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yevgeny Kliteynik @ 2009-10-22 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Khapyorsky; +Cc: Linux RDMA
Implementation of the connect_roots option in fat tree.
Actually, it will not only connect all the roots, but
also all the other switches that are above leaf switch
level.
Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
---
opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
index 5b403f7..366a225 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
@@ -2949,6 +2949,82 @@ static void fabric_route_to_switches(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
/***************************************************
***************************************************/
+static void fabric_route_roots(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
+{
+ uint16_t lid;
+ uint8_t port_num;
+ ftree_sw_t *p_sw;
+ ftree_sw_t *p_leaf_sw;
+
+ OSM_LOG_ENTER(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
+
+ /*
+ * We need a switch that will accomodate all the down/up turns in
+ * the fabric. Having these turn in a single place in the fabric
+ * will not create credit loops.
+ * So we need to select this switch.
+ * The idea here is to chose leaf with the highest index. I don't
+ * have any theory to back me up on this. It's just a general thought
+ * that this way the switch that might be a bottleneck for many mcast
+ * groups will be far away from the OpenSM, so it will draw the
+ * multicast traffic away from the SM.
+ */
+
+ p_leaf_sw = p_ftree->leaf_switches[p_ftree->leaf_switches_num-1];
+
+ /*
+ * Now go over all the switches in the fabric that
+ * have lower rank, and route the missing LIDs to
+ * the selected leaf switch.
+ * In short, this leaf switch now poses a target
+ * for all those missing LIDs.
+ */
+
+ for (p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_head(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
+ p_sw != (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_end(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
+ p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_sw->map_item)) {
+
+ if (p_sw->rank >= p_ftree->leaf_switch_rank)
+ continue;
+
+ for (lid = 1; lid <= p_leaf_sw->p_osm_sw->max_lid_ho; lid ++) {
+
+ if (p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] != OSM_NO_PATH ||
+ p_leaf_sw->hops[lid] == OSM_NO_PATH)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * the missing LID will be routed through the same
+ * port that routes to the selected leaf switch
+ */
+ port_num = p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[p_leaf_sw->base_lid];
+
+ OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
+ "Switch %s: setting path to LID %u "
+ "through port %u\n",
+ tuple_to_str(p_sw->tuple), lid, port_num);
+
+ /* set local lft */
+ p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] = port_num;
+
+ /*
+ * Set local min hop table.
+ * The distance to the target LID is a distance
+ * to the selected leaf switch plus the distance
+ * from the leaf to the target LID.
+ */
+ sw_set_hops(p_sw, lid, port_num,
+ p_sw->hops[p_leaf_sw->base_lid] +
+ p_leaf_sw->hops[lid], TRUE);
+ }
+ }
+
+ OSM_LOG_EXIT(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
+} /* fabric_route_roots() */
+
+/***************************************************
+ ***************************************************/
+
static int fabric_populate_nodes(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
{
osm_node_t *p_osm_node;
@@ -3978,6 +4054,12 @@ static int do_routing(IN void *context)
"Filling switch forwarding tables for switch-to-switch paths\n");
fabric_route_to_switches(p_ftree);
+ if (p_ftree->p_osm->subn.opt.connect_roots) {
+ OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
+ "Connecting nodes that are unreachable within Up/Down rules\n");
+ fabric_route_roots(p_ftree);
+ }
+
/* for each switch, set its fwd table */
cl_qmap_apply_func(&p_ftree->sw_tbl, set_sw_fwd_table, (void *)p_ftree);
--
1.5.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] opensm: connect roots in fat-tree - implementation
[not found] ` <4AE02BB5.5060600-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
@ 2009-10-27 7:26 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yevgeny Kliteynik @ 2009-10-27 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Khapyorsky; +Cc: Linux RDMA
Sasha,
Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
> Implementation of the connect_roots option in fat tree.
> Actually, it will not only connect all the roots, but
> also all the other switches that are above leaf switch
> level.
If you have already reviewed this (and the second) patch,
that's cool. If not, please ignore it. I have this thing
integrated in a bigger patch series. Will post in a few
minutes.
-- Yevgeny
> Signed-off-by: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
>
> ---
> opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> index 5b403f7..366a225 100644
> --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_ucast_ftree.c
> @@ -2949,6 +2949,82 @@ static void fabric_route_to_switches(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
> /***************************************************
> ***************************************************/
>
> +static void fabric_route_roots(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
> +{
> + uint16_t lid;
> + uint8_t port_num;
> + ftree_sw_t *p_sw;
> + ftree_sw_t *p_leaf_sw;
> +
> + OSM_LOG_ENTER(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
> +
> + /*
> + * We need a switch that will accomodate all the down/up turns in
> + * the fabric. Having these turn in a single place in the fabric
> + * will not create credit loops.
> + * So we need to select this switch.
> + * The idea here is to chose leaf with the highest index. I don't
> + * have any theory to back me up on this. It's just a general thought
> + * that this way the switch that might be a bottleneck for many mcast
> + * groups will be far away from the OpenSM, so it will draw the
> + * multicast traffic away from the SM.
> + */
> +
> + p_leaf_sw = p_ftree->leaf_switches[p_ftree->leaf_switches_num-1];
> +
> + /*
> + * Now go over all the switches in the fabric that
> + * have lower rank, and route the missing LIDs to
> + * the selected leaf switch.
> + * In short, this leaf switch now poses a target
> + * for all those missing LIDs.
> + */
> +
> + for (p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_head(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
> + p_sw != (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_end(&p_ftree->sw_tbl);
> + p_sw = (ftree_sw_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_sw->map_item)) {
> +
> + if (p_sw->rank >= p_ftree->leaf_switch_rank)
> + continue;
> +
> + for (lid = 1; lid <= p_leaf_sw->p_osm_sw->max_lid_ho; lid ++) {
> +
> + if (p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] != OSM_NO_PATH ||
> + p_leaf_sw->hops[lid] == OSM_NO_PATH)
> + continue;
> +
> + /*
> + * the missing LID will be routed through the same
> + * port that routes to the selected leaf switch
> + */
> + port_num = p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[p_leaf_sw->base_lid];
> +
> + OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_DEBUG,
> + "Switch %s: setting path to LID %u "
> + "through port %u\n",
> + tuple_to_str(p_sw->tuple), lid, port_num);
> +
> + /* set local lft */
> + p_sw->p_osm_sw->new_lft[lid] = port_num;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set local min hop table.
> + * The distance to the target LID is a distance
> + * to the selected leaf switch plus the distance
> + * from the leaf to the target LID.
> + */
> + sw_set_hops(p_sw, lid, port_num,
> + p_sw->hops[p_leaf_sw->base_lid] +
> + p_leaf_sw->hops[lid], TRUE);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + OSM_LOG_EXIT(&p_ftree->p_osm->log);
> +} /* fabric_route_roots() */
> +
> +/***************************************************
> + ***************************************************/
> +
> static int fabric_populate_nodes(IN ftree_fabric_t * p_ftree)
> {
> osm_node_t *p_osm_node;
> @@ -3978,6 +4054,12 @@ static int do_routing(IN void *context)
> "Filling switch forwarding tables for switch-to-switch paths\n");
> fabric_route_to_switches(p_ftree);
>
> + if (p_ftree->p_osm->subn.opt.connect_roots) {
> + OSM_LOG(&p_ftree->p_osm->log, OSM_LOG_VERBOSE,
> + "Connecting nodes that are unreachable within Up/Down rules\n");
> + fabric_route_roots(p_ftree);
> + }
> +
> /* for each switch, set its fwd table */
> cl_qmap_apply_func(&p_ftree->sw_tbl, set_sw_fwd_table, (void *)p_ftree);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-27 7:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-22 9:53 [PATCH 1/2] opensm: connect roots in fat-tree - implementation Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4AE02BB5.5060600-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-27 7:26 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox