Re: [PATCH 2/2] rdma/cm: allow user to specify IP to DGID mapping

[Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]

Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> So why not have a more general, flexible approach? Isolating ACM from librdmacm by using AF_IB is a good idea, it keeps them seperate and lets ACM and future go where ever. I hope Sean can make it work with the rdma_getddrinfo idea, that would completely seperate ACM and librdmacm
Generally speaking, AF_IB/PS_IB sounds okay to me, even though I am not 
clear what applications are going to use it, maybe some examples please?
> Attempting to bake it into AF_INET means that librdmacm, possibly the kernel and maybe even the apps need to be contaminated with ACM specific code, and that just doesn't seem desirable to me. What happens when someone invents BCM or CCM? More mess
I don't agree, the only place where librdmacm goes to ACM is to resolve 
DGID and a route. This can be done with rdma_getdgidinfo & 
rdma_getrouteinfo if you like (maybe you do the implementation?), or 
with ACM (later BCM, CCM) plugin used by librdmacm or by calls from 
librdmacm to ACM. But in any case, the kernel code nor the app will not 
be contaminated.

Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html