* [PATCH] Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet when SGID and/or DGID
@ 2009-10-30 11:40 Eli Dorfman
[not found] ` <1256902806-12040-1-git-send-email-elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Dorfman @ 2009-10-30 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Eli Dorfman
From: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
---
opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
index f36eb46..0c6621b 100644
--- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
+++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ Exit:
/**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************/
-static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa,
+static int pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa,
IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
IN const osm_port_t * p_req_port,
IN const osm_port_t * p_src_port,
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa,
uint16_t dest_lid_max_ho;
uint16_t src_lid_ho;
uint16_t dest_lid_ho;
- uint32_t path_num;
+ uint32_t path_num = 0;
uint8_t preference;
uintn_t iterations;
uintn_t src_offset;
@@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa,
Preferred paths come first in OpenSM
*/
preference = 0;
- path_num = 0;
+ path_num = cl_qlist_count(p_list);
/* If SubnAdmGet, assume NumbPaths 1 (1.2 erratum) */
if (p_sa_mad->method != IB_MAD_METHOD_GET)
@@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa,
Exit:
OSM_LOG_EXIT(sa->p_log);
+ return path_num;
}
/**********************************************************************
@@ -1314,6 +1315,8 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl;
const osm_port_t *p_dest_port;
const osm_port_t *p_src_port;
+ const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad;
+ int num_paths = 0;
OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log);
@@ -1326,14 +1329,17 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
any check to determine the reversability of the paths.
*/
p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl;
+ p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw);
p_dest_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl);
while (p_dest_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) {
p_src_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl);
while (p_src_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) {
- pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
- p_src_port, p_dest_port,
- p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list);
+ num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
+ p_src_port, p_dest_port,
+ p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list);
+ if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1)
+ return;
p_src_port =
(osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_src_port->map_item);
@@ -1358,6 +1364,8 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
{
const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl;
const osm_port_t *p_port;
+ const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad;
+ int num_paths = 0;
OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log);
@@ -1367,6 +1375,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
need to special case that one.
*/
p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl;
+ p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw);
if (p_src_port) {
/*
@@ -1374,9 +1383,11 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
*/
p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl);
while (p_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) {
- pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
- p_src_port, p_port, p_dgid,
- comp_mask, p_list);
+ num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
+ p_src_port, p_port, p_dgid,
+ comp_mask, p_list);
+ if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1)
+ goto Exit;
p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item);
}
} else {
@@ -1385,13 +1396,16 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw,
*/
p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl);
while (p_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) {
- pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
- p_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid,
- comp_mask, p_list);
+ num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port,
+ p_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid,
+ comp_mask, p_list);
+ if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1)
+ goto Exit;
p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item);
}
}
+Exit:
OSM_LOG_EXIT(sa->p_log);
}
--
1.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1256902806-12040-1-git-send-email-elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet when SGID and/or DGID [not found] ` <1256902806-12040-1-git-send-email-elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> @ 2009-11-02 15:03 ` Sasha Khapyorsky 2009-11-02 15:59 ` [PATCH v2] opensm: Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wild carded elid 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-11-02 15:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eli Dorfman; +Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Eli Dorfman Hi Eli, On 13:40 Fri 30 Oct , Eli Dorfman wrote: > From: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Please add descriptive change log. It is hard (for me) to just remember an issue in all details. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> > --- > opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c > index f36eb46..0c6621b 100644 > --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c > +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c > @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ Exit: > > /********************************************************************** > **********************************************************************/ > -static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa, > +static int pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa, > IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > IN const osm_port_t * p_req_port, > IN const osm_port_t * p_src_port, > @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa, > uint16_t dest_lid_max_ho; > uint16_t src_lid_ho; > uint16_t dest_lid_ho; > - uint32_t path_num; > + uint32_t path_num = 0; It is reinitialized later as: path_num = cl_qlist_count(p_list); , one of them is not needed. > uint8_t preference; > uintn_t iterations; > uintn_t src_offset; > @@ -1019,7 +1019,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa, > Preferred paths come first in OpenSM > */ > preference = 0; > - path_num = 0; > + path_num = cl_qlist_count(p_list); Is this correct? In this way pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths() will return a total number of PRs collected in previous calls too (not for just specific source/destination call). No? > > /* If SubnAdmGet, assume NumbPaths 1 (1.2 erratum) */ > if (p_sa_mad->method != IB_MAD_METHOD_GET) > @@ -1111,6 +1111,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(IN osm_sa_t * sa, > > Exit: > OSM_LOG_EXIT(sa->p_log); > + return path_num; > } > > /********************************************************************** > @@ -1314,6 +1315,8 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl; > const osm_port_t *p_dest_port; > const osm_port_t *p_src_port; > + const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad; > + int num_paths = 0; > > OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log); > > @@ -1326,14 +1329,17 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > any check to determine the reversability of the paths. > */ > p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl; > + p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw); > > p_dest_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl); > while (p_dest_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) { > p_src_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl); > while (p_src_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) { > - pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > - p_src_port, p_dest_port, > - p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list); > + num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > + p_src_port, p_dest_port, > + p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list); > + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1) > + return; So it will return with num_paths > 1. Then wouldn't an error (too many records) be generated by osm_sa_respond() (just similar to as it is now)? I guess so. So shouldn't here be something like: if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && cl_qlist_count(p_list) >= 1) break; (, and then you don't need to bother with num_paths in pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths())? > > p_src_port = > (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_src_port->map_item); > @@ -1358,6 +1364,8 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > { > const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl; > const osm_port_t *p_port; > + const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad; > + int num_paths = 0; > > OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log); > > @@ -1367,6 +1375,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > need to special case that one. > */ > p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl; > + p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw); > > if (p_src_port) { > /* > @@ -1374,9 +1383,11 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > */ > p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl); > while (p_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) { > - pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > - p_src_port, p_port, p_dgid, > - comp_mask, p_list); > + num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > + p_src_port, p_port, p_dgid, > + comp_mask, p_list); > + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1) Ditto. > + goto Exit; 'break' will work too. > p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item); > } > } else { > @@ -1385,13 +1396,16 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, > */ > p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl); > while (p_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) { > - pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > - p_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid, > - comp_mask, p_list); > + num_paths += pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, > + p_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid, > + comp_mask, p_list); > + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && num_paths > 1) Ditto. > + goto Exit; 'break' will work too > p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item); > } > } > > +Exit: and then exit label is not needed. Sasha > OSM_LOG_EXIT(sa->p_log); > } > > -- > 1.5.5 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wild carded 2009-11-02 15:03 ` Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-11-02 15:59 ` elid [not found] ` <4AEF01CE.3040809-hKgKHo2Ms0F+cjeuK/JdrQ@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: elid @ 2009-11-02 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sasha Khapyorsky; +Cc: Eli Dorfman, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wildcarded Instead of iterating over all ports in the fabric and returning an error (TOO_MANY_RECORDS), when SGID and/or DGID are wild carded return only single PathRecord. Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> --- opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c index c2ef8c5..b3e1072 100644 --- a/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c +++ b/opensm/opensm/osm_sa_path_record.c @@ -1313,6 +1313,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl; const osm_port_t *p_dest_port; const osm_port_t *p_src_port; + const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad; OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log); @@ -1325,6 +1326,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, any check to determine the reversability of the paths. */ p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl; + p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw); p_dest_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_head(p_tbl); while (p_dest_port != (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_end(p_tbl)) { @@ -1333,6 +1335,9 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, p_src_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list); + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && + cl_qlist_count(p_list) > 0) + goto Exit; p_src_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_src_port->map_item); @@ -1342,6 +1347,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_world(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_dest_port->map_item); } +Exit: OSM_LOG_EXIT(sa->p_log); } @@ -1357,6 +1363,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, { const cl_qmap_t *p_tbl; const osm_port_t *p_port; + const ib_sa_mad_t *p_sa_mad; OSM_LOG_ENTER(sa->p_log); @@ -1366,6 +1373,7 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, need to special case that one. */ p_tbl = &sa->p_subn->port_guid_tbl; + p_sa_mad = osm_madw_get_sa_mad_ptr(p_madw); if (p_src_port) { /* @@ -1376,6 +1384,9 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, p_src_port, p_port, p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list); + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && + cl_qlist_count(p_list) > 0) + break; p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item); } } else { @@ -1387,6 +1398,9 @@ static void pr_rcv_process_half(IN osm_sa_t * sa, IN const osm_madw_t * p_madw, pr_rcv_get_port_pair_paths(sa, p_madw, requester_port, p_port, p_dest_port, p_dgid, comp_mask, p_list); + if (p_sa_mad->method == IB_MAD_METHOD_GET && + cl_qlist_count(p_list) > 0) + break; p_port = (osm_port_t *) cl_qmap_next(&p_port->map_item); } } -- 1.5.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4AEF01CE.3040809-hKgKHo2Ms0F+cjeuK/JdrQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH v2] opensm: Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wild carded [not found] ` <4AEF01CE.3040809-hKgKHo2Ms0F+cjeuK/JdrQ@public.gmane.org> @ 2009-11-02 16:37 ` Sasha Khapyorsky 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-11-02 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: elid; +Cc: Eli Dorfman, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 17:59 Mon 02 Nov , elid wrote: > Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wildcarded > > Instead of iterating over all ports in the fabric and returning an error (TOO_MANY_RECORDS), > when SGID and/or DGID are wild carded return only single PathRecord. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Dorfman <elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Applied. Thanks. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-02 16:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-30 11:40 [PATCH] Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet when SGID and/or DGID Eli Dorfman
[not found] ` <1256902806-12040-1-git-send-email-elid-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-02 15:03 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-11-02 15:59 ` [PATCH v2] opensm: Return single PathRecord for SubnAdmGet with DGID/SGID wild carded elid
[not found] ` <4AEF01CE.3040809-hKgKHo2Ms0F+cjeuK/JdrQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-02 16:37 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox