From: "Céline Bourde" <celine.bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: qos on service-id
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:22:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0A9A8B.4020908@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0e08f230911230604m5b33f47ax4599e634712b57e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
You right, it is just an isolated node.
We don't have to take this into account
Hal Rosenstock a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Céline Bourde <celine.bourde@bull.net> wrote:
>
>> My /var/log/opensm.log output:
>>
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 824870 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_init: 1000 pending
>> umads specified
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 825157 [9C8566F0] 0x80 -> Entering DISCOVERING state
>> Using default GUID 0x2c9000100d00056d
>> Loading Cached Option:qos_max_vls = 8
>> Loading Cached Option:qos_high_limit = 1
>> Loading Cached Option:qos_vlarb_high = 0:1,1:0,2:0,3:0,4:0
>> Loading Cached Option:qos_vlarb_low = 0:1,1:2,2:4,3:8,4:0,5:32
>> Loading Cached Option:qos_sl2vl = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>> Entering MASTER state
>>
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 840416 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port
>> 0x2c9000100d00056d
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 877496 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port
>> 0x2c9000100d00056d
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 877646 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_vendor_bind: Binding to port
>> 0x2c9000100d00056d
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 877794 [9C8566F0] 0x02 -> osm_opensm_bind: Setting IS_SM on
>> port 0x2c9000100d00056d
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 952249 [98C4F910] 0x80 -> Entering MASTER state
>> Nov 20 14:33:58 952467 [98C4F910] 0x02 -> osm_qos_parse_policy_file: Loading
>> QoS policy file (/etc/opensm/qos-policy.conf)
>> Nov 20 14:33:59 047411 [9824E910] 0x01 -> sm_mad_ctrl_rcv_callback: ERR
>> 3111: Error status = 0x1C
>> Nov 20 14:33:59 047894 [9824E910] 0x01 -> SMP dump:
>> base_ver................0x1
>> mgmt_class..............0x81
>> class_ver...............0x1
>> method..................0x81 (SubnGetResp)
>> D bit...................0x1
>> status..................0x1C
>> hop_ptr.................0x0
>> hop_count...............0x2
>> trans_id................0x18ef
>> attr_id.................0x17
>> (SLtoVLMappingTable)
>> resv....................0x0
>> attr_mod................0x0
>> m_key...................0x0000000000000000
>> dr_slid.................65535
>> dr_dlid.................65535
>>
>> Initial path: 0,1,31
>> Return path: 0,22,1
>> Reserved: [0][0][0][0][0][0][0]
>>
>> 01 23 45 67 01 23 45 6F 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 00
>>
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 00
>>
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 00
>>
>> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> 00
>>
>
> What node (NodeInfo) is at direct route 0,1,31 relative to the SM node ?
>
> Is it just this AM failing for the SLtoVLMapping attribute or others too ?
>
> -- Hal
>
>
>> Céline Bourde a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to configure qos-policy.donc file for service-id use.
>>> I've tried basic RDMA_PS_TCP service-id level with service id 0x0106
>>>
>>> []# cat /etc/opensm/qos-policy.conf
>>> qos-levels
>>> qos-level
>>> name: DEFAULT
>>> sl: 0
>>> end-qos-level
>>> qos-level
>>> name: TCP
>>> sl: 4
>>> end-qos-level
>>> qos-level
>>> name: MPI
>>> sl: 5
>>> end-qos-level
>>> end-qos-levels
>>>
>>> qos-ulps
>>> default : 0 # default SL
>>> any, service-id 0x0000000001060000- 0x000000000106FFFF : 4
>>> end-qos-ulps
>>>
>>> I add this rule in my configuration and check by mapping
>>> sl 4 on a vl with a weight of 0
>>>
>>> # QoS default options
>>> qos_max_vls 8
>>> qos_high_limit 1
>>> qos_vlarb_high 0:1,1:0,2:0,3:0,4:0
>>> qos_vlarb_low 0:1,1:2,2:4,3:8,4:0,5:32
>>> qos_sl2vl 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>>>
>>> I've launched qperf on the server side
>>> and listen on client:
>>>
>>> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1
>>> 10.12.1.4 -sl 4 -lp 20004 rc_bw; done;
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 0 bytes/sec
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 0 bytes/sec
>>>
>>> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1
>>> 10.12.1.4 -sl 5 -lp 20005 rc_bw; done;
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 3.37 GB/sec
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 3.37 GB/sec
>>>
>>> Qperf gives me results I expected due to qos-level configuration part, but
>>> no
>>> expected results using qperf tcp_bw, bandwith is not
>>> filtered/blocked by sl weight.
>>>
>>> # j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf 10.12.1.4 tcp_bw; done;
>>> tcp_bw:
>>> bw = 923 MB/sec
>>> tcp_bw:
>>> bw = 935 MB/sec
>>>
>>> j=100; for i in $(seq 0 $j) ; do /usr/bin/qperf -ri mlx4_0:1 -li mlx4_0:1
>>> 10.12.1.4 -sl 5 -lp 20005 rc_bw; done;
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 2.23 GB/sec
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 2.24 GB/sec
>>> rc_bw:
>>> bw = 2.21 GB/sec
>>>
>>> Could you help me to understanding service-id mechanism or give me a
>>> relevant
>>> test to test TCP service id level ?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Céline Bourde.
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 8:48 qos on service-id Céline Bourde
[not found] ` <4B0A4C71.5080209-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-23 10:09 ` Céline Bourde
[not found] ` <4B0A5F64.1030107-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-23 14:04 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f230911230604m5b33f47ax4599e634712b57e-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-23 14:22 ` Céline Bourde [this message]
2009-11-23 14:25 ` Hal Rosenstock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0A9A8B.4020908@bull.net \
--to=celine.bourde-6ktuutfb/bm@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox