From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
To: Vincent Ficet <jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
BOURDE CELINE <Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ?
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:45:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B0D5110.70606@dev.mellanox.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B0D49F0.6060400-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
Vincent Ficet wrote:
> Yevgeny,
>> OK, so there are three possible reasons that I can think of:
>> 1. Something is wrong in the configuration.
>> 2. The application does not saturate the link, thus QoS
>> and the whole VL arbitration thing doesn't kick in.
>> 3. There's some bug, somewhere.
>>
>> Let's start with reason no. 1.
>> Please shut off each of the SLs one by one, and
>> make sure that the application gets zero BW on
>> these SLs. You can do it by mapping SL to VL15:
>>
>> qos_sl2vl 0,15,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> If I shut down this SL by moving it to VL15, the interfaces stop pinging.
> This is probably because some IPoIB multicast traffic gets cut off for
> pkey 0x7fff .. ?
Could be, or because ALL interfaces are mapped to
SL1, which is what the results below suggest.
> So no results for this one.
>> and then
>> qos_sl2vl 0,1,15,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>>
> With this setup, and the following QoS settings:
>
> qos_max_vls 8
> qos_high_limit 1
> qos_vlarb_high 0:0,1:0,2:0,3:0,4:0,5:0
> qos_vlarb_low 0:1,1:64,2:128,3:192,4:0,5:0
> qos_sl2vl 0,1,15,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
>
> I get roughly the same values for SL 1 to SL3:
That doesn't look right.
You have shut off SL2, so you can't see same
BW for this SL. Looks like there is a problem
in configuration (or bug in SM).
Have you validated somehow that the interfaces
have been mapped to the right SLs?
> [root@pichu22 ~]# while test -e keep_going; do iperf -c pichu16-ic0 -t
> 10 -P 8 2>&1; done | grep SUM
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 6.15 GBytes 5.28 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 6.00 GBytes 5.16 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.1 sec 5.38 GBytes 4.59 Gbits/sec
>
> [root@pichu22 ~]# while test -e keep_going; do iperf -c pichu16-backbone
> -t 10 -P 8 2>&1; done | grep SUM
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 6.09 GBytes 5.23 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 6.41 GBytes 5.51 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 4.72 GBytes 4.05 Gbits/sec
>
> [root@pichu22 ~]# while test -e keep_going; do iperf -c pichu16-admin -t
> 10 -P 8 2>&1; done | grep SUM
> [SUM] 0.0-10.1 sec 6.96 GBytes 5.92 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.1 sec 5.89 GBytes 5.00 Gbits/sec
> [SUM] 0.0-10.0 sec 5.35 GBytes 4.58 Gbits/sec
>
>> and then
>> qos_sl2vl 0,1,2,15,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> Same results as the previous 0,1,15,3,... SL2vl mapping.
>> If this part works well, then we will continue to
>> reason no. 2.
> In the above tests, I used -P8 to force 8 threads on the client side for
> each test.
> I have one quad core CPU(Intel E55400).
> This makes 24 iperf threads on 4 cores, which __should__ be fine (well I
> suppose ...)
Best would be having one qperf per CPU core,
which is 4 qperf's in your case.
What is your subnet setup?
-- Yevgeny
> And regarding reason #3. I still get the error I got yesterday, which
> you told me was not important because the SL's set in partitions.conf
> would override what was read from qos-policy.conf in the first place.
>
> Nov 25 13:13:05 664690 [373E910] 0x01 -> __qos_policy_validate_pkey: ERR
> AC15: pkey 0x0002 in match rule - overriding partition SL (0) with QoS
> Level SL (3)
> Nov 25 13:13:05 664681 [373E910] 0x01 -> __qos_policy_validate_pkey: ERR
> AC15: pkey 0x0001 in match rule - overriding partition SL (0) with QoS
> Level SL (2)
> Nov 25 13:13:05 664670 [373E910] 0x01 -> __qos_policy_validate_pkey: ERR
> AC15: pkey 0x7FFF in match rule - overriding partition SL (0) with QoS
> Level SL (1)
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Vincent
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-25 10:57 QoS settings not mapped correctly per pkey ? Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D0DB2.6080802-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 12:12 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D1F36.1090007-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:01 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D38C7.3080505-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 14:37 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0D410E.2010903-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:14 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0D49F0.6060400-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-25 15:45 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik [this message]
[not found] ` <4B0D5110.70606-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 7:57 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E34EB.6020403-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:25 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E3B63.40705-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 8:49 ` Vincent Ficet
[not found] ` <4B0E4105.5080107-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-26 9:56 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B0E50D6.8020401-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:01 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177058.9070909-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 8:17 ` sebastien dugue
2009-12-03 9:04 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
[not found] ` <4B177F10.1040908-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:08 ` sebastien dugue
2009-12-03 8:21 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <4B1774F0.9060002-hKgKHo2Ms0FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2009-12-03 9:05 ` sebastien dugue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B0D5110.70606@dev.mellanox.co.il \
--to=kliteyn-ldsdmyg8hgv8yrgs2mwiifqbs+8scbdb@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Celine.Bourde-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jean-vincent.ficet-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox