From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: RDMAoE verbs questions Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:26:31 +0200 Message-ID: <4B0E2DA7.7060809@voltaire.com> References: <209ECE49-3AB9-4E62-B825-54E474321FA6@cisco.com> <4B0CDBEC.1030203@voltaire.com> <10904370-1D66-4013-BB3F-0F4B5EE581EE@cisco.com> <4B0D4660.5060701@voltaire.com> <4B0D8FD2.9000702@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4B0D8FD2.9000702-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: pasha-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org Cc: Jeff Squyres , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Pavel Shamis (Pasha) wrote: > The patch is attached Thanks, this patch basically replaces checks for the device transport type to be IB to a check that makes sure either the former happens or the port transport type is rdmaoe. As Jason, Tziporet and noted, the port transport type seems to be bad and non-comapatible/operable idea, so it should and probably could be avoided. I see another patch @ http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2009/11/7063.php can you send that one as well. The you sent patch isn't signed so I can't address the author in further replies (unless you are the author), also it wasn't generated with the -p option of diff which would show for each change what is the effected function, doing so would help in the review. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html