* Re: rdma_bind failure over iWarp
[not found] ` <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F44FE7C1AC-osO9UTpF0URzLByeVOV5+bfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-01-21 6:06 ` Or Gerlitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Or Gerlitz @ 2010-01-21 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Woodruff, Robert J, Hefty, Sean, Moni Shoua
Cc: tziporet-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org,
Tung, Chien Tin, Davis, Arlin R, linux-rdma
Woodruff, Robert J wrote:
> [woody@det-17 src]$ ucmatose -b 192.168.0.17
> cmatose: starting server
> cmatose: bind address failed: No such file or directory
> return status -1
A case were rdma_bind returns -ENOENT was debugged here this week with the problem being the same IP assigned to two interfaces where one of them not being of a HCA/RNIC. I just tried assigning the same IP to on-board 1Gbs and IB HCA and couldn't hit the ucmatose error (2.6.33-rc4 and librdmacm-1.0.8-5.el5).
Moni, anything you can add?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: IBoE patches vs the dual IB/iWARP stack
[not found] ` <44A0A9C45C604E4C8EF3ECF93A21F8BC-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-02-02 5:04 ` Or Gerlitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Or Gerlitz @ 2010-02-02 5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roland Dreier, Eli Cohen
Cc: Sean Hefty, Woodruff, Robert J,
tziporet-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb, Tung, Chien Tin,
Linux RDMA list
Sean Hefty wrote:
> It appears that the dev_type is ARPHDR_ETHER. Is this correct, or should a
> different dev_type be used? Maybe some sort of mapping from ARPHDR_* dev_type
> to an RDMA device type is needed in ib_addr, possibly in rdma_copy_addr().
> Looking at a struct net_device, how do we know what kind of RDMA device we have
> if the ARPHDR dev_type isn't sufficient?
>
> For the call to rdma_addr_get_sgid(), maybe the name or purpose of that call
> needs to be changed, with a second call being added. What cma_acquire_dev()
> wants is a local device address so that it can match the net_device up with the
> ib_device. Perhaps there's a cleaner way to do this than calling
> rdma_addr_get_sgid() from cma_acquire_dev().
>
> Along these same lines, why can't the 'sgid' be incorporated into the
> src_dev_addr, similar to what is done for iwarp devices? I don't really
> understand the function rocee_mac_to_ll(), and maybe it's just the name. I'm
> assuming that 'll' stands for link-layer, correct? Since the MAC address is a
> link-layer address, what layer is the GID
I believe that all Sean's comments apply to the mainline submission of
the IBoE patches, so lets see how they are addressed throughout the
review process.
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-02 5:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F44FE7B5EE@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <603F8A3875DCE940BA37B49D0A6EA0AE58CFBB79@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <603F8A3875DCE940BA37B49D0A6EA0AE58CFBE7F@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <4B576195.6000402@mellanox.co.il>
[not found] ` <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F44FE7C052@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <061D067A03094FC09E4A0933A9262BEA@amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F44FE7C1AC@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F44FE7C1AC-osO9UTpF0URzLByeVOV5+bfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-21 6:06 ` rdma_bind failure over iWarp Or Gerlitz
[not found] ` <44A0A9C45C604E4C8EF3ECF93A21F8BC@amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <44A0A9C45C604E4C8EF3ECF93A21F8BC-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-02 5:04 ` IBoE patches vs the dual IB/iWARP stack Or Gerlitz
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox