From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Eli Dorfman (Voltaire)" Subject: opensm: suggestion to define new common port_groups file Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4B69453E.4080701@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sasha Khapyorsky Cc: Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma , Hal Rosenstock List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Currently there is a duplication of port group definition in OpenSM configuration files. Using a single configuration file for port groups will make it easier to manage and will allow using group name as keyword in other configuration files (i.e. partitions.conf, qos-policy.conf and opensm.conf) The suggested format for port-groups.conf is a simple list: GroupA: GUID1, GUID2, GUID3 GroupB: GUID4, GUID5, GUID6 All configuration files shall still support the old format (of specifying GUIDs explicitly) and will also recognize the new Groups. Following an example of partitions.conf file with new group definition: management=0x7fff,ipoib,defmember=full: GroupA=full, GroupB=limited, ALL_CAS=limited; and qos-policy.conf with the new group definition: port-groups port-group port-guid: GroupA, GroupB name: my.group end-port-group end-port-groups Thanks, Eli -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html