public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tucker <tom-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
To: Tziporet Koren <tziporet-VPRAkNaXOzVS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"ewg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org"
	<ewg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [ewg] MLX4 Strangeness
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:06:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7C3026.9070500@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B7B35DD.1030609-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>

Hi Tziporet:

Here is a trace with the data for WR failing with status 12. The vendor 
error is 129.

Feb 17 12:27:33 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma_event_process:154 wr_id 
0000000000000000 status 12 opcode 0 vendor_err 129 byte_len 0 qp 
ffff81002a13ec00 ex 00000000 src_qp 00000000 wc_flags, 0 pkey_index
Feb 17 12:27:33 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma_event_process:154 wr_id 
ffff81002878d800 status 5 opcode 0 vendor_err 244 byte_len 0 qp 
ffff81002a13ec00 ex 00000000 src_qp 00000000 wc_flags, 0 pkey_index
Feb 17 12:27:33 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma_event_process:167 wr_id 
ffff81002878d800 status 5 opcode 0 vendor_err 244 byte_len 0 qp 
ffff81002a13ec00 ex 00000000 src_qp 00000000 wc_flags, 0 pkey_index

Any thoughts?
Tom

Tom Tucker wrote:
> Tom Tucker wrote:
>> Tziporet Koren wrote:
>>> On 2/15/2010 10:24 PM, Tom Tucker wrote:
>>>  
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I am seeing some very strange behavior on my MLX4 adapters running 2.7
>>>> firmware and the latest OFED 1.5.1. Two systems are involved and each
>>>> have dual ported MTHCA DDR adapter and MLX4 adapters.
>>>>
>>>> The scenario starts with NFSRDMA stress testing between the two 
>>>> systems
>>>> running bonnie++ and iozone concurrently. The test completes and there
>>>> is no issue. Then 6 minutes pass and the server "times out" the
>>>> connection and shuts down the RC connection to the client.
>>>>
>>>>   From this point on, using the RDMA CM, a new RC QP can be brought up
>>>> and moved to RTS, however, the first RDMA_SEND to the NFS SERVER 
>>>> system
>>>> fails with IB_WC_RETRY_EXC_ERR. I have confirmed:
>>>>
>>>> - that "arp" completed successfully and the neighbor entries are
>>>> populated on both the client and server
>>>> - that the QP are in the RTS state on both the client and server
>>>> - that there are RECV WR posted to the RQ on the server and they 
>>>> did not
>>>> error out
>>>> - that no RECV WR completed successfully or in error on the server
>>>> - that there are SEND WR posted to the QP on the client
>>>> - the client side SEND_WR fails with error 12 as mentioned above
>>>>
>>>> I have also confirmed the following with a different application (i.e.
>>>> rping):
>>>>
>>>> server# rping -s
>>>> client# rping -c -a 192.168.80.129
>>>>
>>>> fails with the exact same error, i.e.
>>>> client# rping -c -a 192.168.80.129
>>>> cq completion failed status 12
>>>> wait for RDMA_WRITE_ADV state 10
>>>> client DISCONNECT EVENT...
>>>>
>>>> However, if I run rping the other way, it works fine, that is,
>>>>
>>>> client# rping -s
>>>> server# rping -c -a 192.168.80.135
>>>>
>>>> It runs without error until I stop it.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have any ideas on how I might debug this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> Tom
>>> What is the vendor syndrome error when you get a completion with error?
>>>
>>>   
>> Feb 16 15:08:29 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 
>> 192.168.80.129:20049 closed (-103)
>> Feb 16 15:51:27 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 
>> 192.168.80.129:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16
>> Feb 16 15:52:01 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma_event_process:160 wr_id 
>> ffff81002879a000 status 5 opcode 0 vendor_err 244 byte_len 0 qp 
>> ffff81003c9e3200 ex 00000000 src_qp 00000000 wc_flags, 0 pkey_index
>> Feb 16 15:52:06 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 
>> 192.168.80.129:20049 closed (-103)
>> Feb 16 15:52:06 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma: connection to 
>> 192.168.80.129:20049 on mlx4_0, memreg 5 slots 32 ird 16
>> Feb 16 15:52:40 vic10 kernel: rpcrdma_event_process:160 wr_id 
>> ffff81002879a000 status 5 opcode 0 vendor_err 244 byte_len 0 qp 
>> ffff81002f2d8400 ex 00000000 src_qp 00000000 wc_flags, 0 pkey_index
>>
>> Repeat forever....
>>
>> So the vendor err is 244.
>>
>
> Please ignore this. This log skips the failing WR (:-\). I need to do 
> another trace.
>
>
>
>>> Does the issue occurs only on the ConnectX cards (mlx4) or also on 
>>> the InfiniHost cards (mthca)
>>>
>>> Tziporet
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ewg mailing list
>>> ewg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
>>> http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
>>>   
>>
>>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-17 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-15 20:24 MLX4 Strangeness Tom Tucker
     [not found] ` <4B79AD88.8000101-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-16  7:53   ` [ewg] " Tziporet Koren
     [not found]     ` <4B7A4EF4.9090209-VPRAkNaXOzVS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-16 15:21       ` Tom Tucker
2010-02-16 21:31       ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]         ` <4B7B0E98.9030506-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-17  0:18           ` Tom Tucker
     [not found]             ` <4B7B35DD.1030609-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-17  0:25               ` Tom Tucker
2010-02-17 18:06               ` Tom Tucker [this message]
2010-02-19  0:03                 ` Vu Pham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B7C3026.9070500@opengridcomputing.com \
    --to=tom-7bpotxp6k4+p2yhjcf5u+vpxobypeauw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ewg-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tziporet-VPRAkNaXOzVS1MOuV/RT9w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox