From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Moni Shoua Subject: Re: [ewg] [PATCH v4] IB Core: RAW ETH support Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:47:41 +0300 Message-ID: <4C18F21D.3050502@Voltaire.COM> References: <1276513450.30132.51.camel@alst60.voltaire.com> <4C18DB37.6050501@opengridcomputing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C18DB37.6050501-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Steve Wise Cc: Roland Dreier , Alekseys Senin , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Eli Cohen , "ewg-G2znmakfqn7U1rindQTSdQ@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > > > It doesn't even look like this patch and the mlx4 patch were ever posted > to linux-rdma. Only to the EWG list. > Not 100% correct. See thread from April 30. Patches to core, libibverbs and NES driver were presented there. > Granted our dev process may not be documented, but I always assumed the > general idea was to get changes accepted upstream, then pull into ofed. > OFED is just a mechanism to make top-of-tree linux work on distro > kernels. There are some exceptions, but this stuff shouldn't be an > exception. > > We should all follow this "upstream first" process IMO. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html