From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Wise Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/CMA: fix iWARP adapter TCP port space usage Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 13:48:48 -0500 Message-ID: <4C225710.7080403@opengridcomputing.com> References: <4C224652.2060601@opengridcomputing.com> <2EFBCAEF10980645BBCFB605689E08E90492696E76@azsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2EFBCAEF10980645BBCFB605689E08E90492696E76-uLM7Qlg6MbdZtRGVdHMbwrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Tung, Chien Tin" Cc: Roland Dreier , Bernard Metzler , Jason Gunthorpe , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Tung, Chien Tin wrote: >>> I think this is an extremely strong argument against the patch that >>> started the thread. Breaking soft iWARP seems a fatal flaw. >>> >>> - R. >>> >>> >> I agree. >> > > The patch or SoftiWARP can be reworked to allow the whole iWARP family > to coexist. It is a matter of agreeing on which path to take. > > I agree with this too! :) My only reason for stating I agree with Roland/Bernard is that reserving a port in the rdma-cm definitely breaks software iwarp, so we need to rethink this whole thing in light of software iwarp. Steve. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html