From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: root owned writable files under /sys Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:42:21 +0300 Message-ID: <4C3413BD.5030008@Voltaire.com> References: <4C082598.8000809@oracle.com> <4C0B2B24.6020304@Voltaire.com> <4C0BC819.1060201@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C0BC819.1060201-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sumeet Lahorani , Jack Morgenstein , Tziporet Koren Cc: Roland Dreier , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Sumeet Lahorani wrote: > # find /sys -type f -perm -222 > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/0000:13:00.0/port_trigger > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/0000:13:00.0/mlx4_port2 > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:04.0/0000:13:00.0/mlx4_port1 Jack, Tziporet Can you clarify the status of the upstream kernel mlx4 multi-protocol support? looking on Linus git, I see one commit, 7ff93f8b7ecbc36e7ffc5c11a61643821c1bfee5 "mlx4_core: Multiple port type support" dated to Oct 2008, wheres ofed ships couple of patches touching this area, e.g adding the above sysfs entries. So what is the extra functionality introduced or bug/s fixed by those patches? any reason not to push them upstream? Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html