From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] IB Netlink Interface and RDMA CM exports Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:23:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4CE536CE.6010705@voltaire.com> References: <4CE00A72.30001@voltaire.com> <20101115031904.GA3566@obsidianresearch.com> <1289836604.2258.1091.camel@nirm-desktop> <20101116062602.GA488@obsidianresearch.com> <1289923079.2258.1149.camel@nirm-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nir Muchtar Cc: Roland Dreier , Jason Gunthorpe , rolandd-FYB4Gu1CFyUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, monis-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Roland Dreier wrote: > I think we should probably put this in the core module rather than creating yet another module. I don't really see what the advantage of separating netlink into its own module is. If we're going on putting the netlink code in an existing module, ib_core would fit better, since there are occasions where uverbs will not be loaded but still we'd like very much (...) to trace things such as rdma_cm connections made by kernel ULPs such as nfs-rdma, iser, rds and alike. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html