From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hal Rosenstock Subject: Re: Has the patch for sa busy been accepted? Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 09:43:32 -0500 Message-ID: <4CF65F14.2030206@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <4C2744E8AD2982428C5BFE523DF8CDCB4A208DF11A@MNEXMB1.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C2744E8AD2982428C5BFE523DF8CDCB4A208DF11A-amwN6d8PyQWXx9kJd3VG2h2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Heinz Cc: Roland Dreier , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Todd Rimmer List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Mike, On 12/1/2010 9:28 AM, Mike Heinz wrote: > Roland, > > Back on November 2nd, Sean said > >> Given all this, then I think it would be okay to accept the patch to drop busy responses> from the SA until this framework is in place, which wouldn't be until 2.6.38 or 39. >> >> - Sean > > I just want to touch base on that - has the SA BUSY patch been accepted for inclusion? I may have missed this but did my comments on this patch from back on 10/28 get addressed ? -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html