From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mlx4: Protocol distinction Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:26:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4CF74A40.5000608@voltaire.com> References: <4CF67444.4080001@senin.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Aleksey Senin , Yevgeny Petrilin Cc: Jack Morgenstein , Roland Dreier , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Eli Cohen , alekseys-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 12/2/2010 8:53 AM, Aleksey Senin wrote: > I don't think that this specific change should check firmware version, > because it not dealing with hardware directly and it should work with > older firmware too. So the modified code works with older firmware, good news, Yevgeny, does this apply also to UC/MC steering patches which Tziporet mentioned recently? > Its restriction, that now it will support 2^30 members for QP instead of 2^32. I don't understand what "members for QP" means. And anyway, I don't think there's something in the HCA which can be allocated in the order of Gigs (billions, except maybe for bandwidth...) typically it goes up to Megs (millions). Also, as said here and elsewhere couple of times, bottom posting is very much easier and fun to work with for open-source development, if you want to learn a bit more on that, take a look @ http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html